May 13th 05, 04:00 PM
|
|
|
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 12 May 2005 04:29:35 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005 08:40:31 -0400, Dave Hall
wrote in :
On Wed, 11 May 2005 02:36:52 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
(The politics of science is often more important than the science
itself. It's a proven fact that the Earth is undergoing a period of
global warming, and that it's caused by the influence of man on the
environment. But politics plays the game that such facts are nothing
more than speculations made by a few fringe researchers looking to get
their names in the journals)
There has been no conclusive proof that
global warming is primarily the result of man's
influence over the environment.
(Yes, there is indeed conclusive proof.)
No there isn't, for the simple reason that we do
not have enough climatic history to determine
just how and when the climate shifts normally
as a reference before we can accurately
gauge the additional effects of humans.
The history of the earth's climate is well documented back to the
begining of the earth's creation...grammar school basic earth and
science taught this. Carbon dating confirms much ad plays a large part
of the techniques used to arrive at such widely accepted and mainstream
taught scientific facts.
Chloroflourocarbons released by the burning of fossil fuels is directly
linked to global warming. Global warming was proved by the continual
shrinkage of the polar ice cap confirmed by 24-7 high tech monitoring of
such. Villages that reside in the frozen tundra watch their mountains of
ice shrink each year.
Existentialism. IMHO a rather selfish and
closed mindset.
I am. But I'm not so close minded that I'm just
going to "accept" that I exist and not ponder
why.
Some feel the same about poorly crafted laws, but you take issue with
those free-thinkers and it moves you toward the goblin that you are
unable to cast out and exercise of yourself.
Dave
"Sandbagger"
n3cvj
|