Reg:

You kinda relate SWR meters to "time", huh? Well, I am used to being fooled
by "non-existant" "things"-"values" which we plug into formulas and somehow
get workable results back!!!! The "Unified Antenna Theory" will be a nice
thing--when it finally gets here... so, a SWR meter which doesn't work as
"mentally modeled"--hey, perfectly understandable!!!

So, not in anyway in disagreement with you, just poking a bit of fun at the
way things work...

Like I say, I miss the old PA tubes--dull almost dark red glow from the
plates--good to excellent... brighter almost cherry red--danger will
robinson!!!!... orange'ish-red--time to buy new finals!!!!! grin

I am at a complete loss on the email... may have picked up some malicious
email from a "fan" of mine... have worn myself out attempting to find the
problem--you can count on me NOT giving up until it is fixed... I keep a
seperate computer for use here--this demonstrates why...

Warmest regards,
John
--
If "God"--expecting an angel... if evolution--expecting an alien... just
wondering if I will be able to tell the difference!

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
| John,
|
| All the so-called SWR meter tells you is whether or not the
| transmitter is being loaded with 50 ohms.
|
| This may be a useful thing to know. But it is NOT SWR. Where is the
| line on which the SWR is supposed to be measured?
|
| By the way, I think I am receiving all your emails. But you do not
| appear to be receiving any of mine. Don't think I do not wish to
| speak to you.
|
| Could you check that you can receive other people's emails?
| ----
| Reg, G4FGQ
|
|