From: "K4YZ" on Sun,May 15 2005 1:17 am

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
Sociopath Steve wrote:


Liar! And it's "They're wondering".

"Dialing...." Steve lets his fingers do the wandering. Hi, hi!

Did dial...

Intersting conversation.

Some very interesting folks in Fairfield County.

Tsk. Typical Robeson IMPLICATION. NO details of

1. The actual authority in this "Fairfield County."

2. What was said. [Robeson will cite some alleged
"privacy" ergo he will not have to reveal anything]

3. Nothing at all on the "interesting" part.

4. All of the above is just total nonsense, a
fantasy on Robeson's part.

You fit right in with Brian Burke and Lennie Anderson! They
both
have lot's of make-believe friends too!

Steve, K4YZ

Sorry, no make believe friends, make believe phone calls, make
believe
MARS appointments, nor make believe hostile actions.

That is entirely your make believe arena.

Nope.

Actually, Robeson is "taking the chance" by NOT finding
out anything in detail. He is BLUFFING without having
done any research.

Take a chance, Oh Cowardly One...

Robeson seems to be the "coward." Having had over five
years to "research" ANYTHING I've mentioned in regards
to employers OR currently-living amateur radio licensee
friends, he has FAILED to do so.

Instead, Robeson FABRICATED an entirely FALSE person
who allegedly "knew me" at NADC (closed for a decade)
back in 1971. Robeson MANUFACTURED a FALSITY that I
"was seeking employment there" even though I've
explained otherwise (I was, and continued to be, an
employee of RCA Corporation until 1975). Robeson
took a "coward's" route by MANUFACTURING A FALSITY.

Chief AF MARS. (Need the address?) Can get you the address for
the administrative officer at 1st MAW or MCB camp Butler if you'd
like.

The USAF Communications Headquarters is at Scott AFB,
isn't it? Why is Stebie mentioning Air Force? :-)
Stebie might think that Scott AFB will close its doors
quickly since it is on the DoD closure list...then
"nobody can find out." :-)

In reality, DETAILED unit records in the U.S. military
are NOT kept forever. This is particularly true for
enlisted personnel. Few military units and installations
remain intact in one place with "personnel departments"
equivalent to civilian employers. Units can be
deactivated, reactivated, or merged with other units on
a rapid basis, their names and nomenclatures changed
(seemingly at whims of higher commanders) as fast as
orders can be "cut." :-)

Stebie is BLUFFING when he expects an old unit of "his"
to be intact 24 years after his claim of service there.
Not only that, but he is ignorant of the Privacy Act of
1974. Requests for information must be in writing.
Legal cites: 5 U.S.C. 552a(3)(3)on writing plus
authority on information in 44 U.S.C. 2907, 3101, and
Public Law 104-134 (April 26, 1996).

The best bet for a response is through NARA at the
NPRC [National Archives and Records Administration,
National Personnel Records Center at St. Louis, MO]
Website: www.nara.gov (click on links to get NPRC)

Requests for information BY veterans or approved
family relatives is free but can take up to 12 weeks.
Requests for information MUST be done in WRITING,
sent by mail or FAX. There IS a charge for others,
such as employer personnel departments, but costs
will have to be determined for that first before
any information is returned.

Since the NPRC has some 70 million records, they
require detailed information such as an SN or SSN.
[my ASN was RA16408336 but the USA and USAF changed
over to SSN on 1 Jul 69, USN on 1 Jan 72, and USCG
on 1 Oct 74] To submit ANY request for information,
Standard Form 180 must be used whether by mail or
FAX (form available for download on website or by
writing NPRC at 9700 Page Ave., St. Louis, MO,
63132-5100). A veteran's SSN (Social Security
Number) MUST be included whether or not a Service
Number (SN) is included in the form.

Such corroborating request data is necessary in
WRITING to put a damper on bluffers, blackmailers,
fraud and scam artists or other perverse
individuals out to "get" others. However, the
bluffers can just manufacture their own "records"
and use others' lack of their SSN to verify the
bluffers' service record CLAIMS. Since those
records do NOT contain EVERYTHING, CLAIMS cannot
be ascertained fully...so the CLAIMANT can go on
their outraged, high-horse attitude against anyone
doubting them! :-)

One way to ascertain and verify another's claims
is to cite friends and acquaintences who served
together in the same unit...as I did with Gene
Rosenbaum, N2JTV. Or have an interview done with
an unbiased third party such as the Pacific Stars
& Stripes (visible on estripes archives for 10 Nov
2002). Or have in possession documents from the
unit or by the unit (as I do, two of which are
posted at another's website)...or have official
service branch photographs marked by the distinctive
back-of-photo information (as I do).

Apparently Robeson doesn't accept any mention of
friends who have amateur radio licenses (as I have
with W6MJN or KD6JG). Robeson thinks such are
"make-believe." :-) In that case the Los Angeles
County Registrar-Recorder is "also wrong" since Al
Walston (W6MJN) and his signature is on my marriage
certificate as a witness (he was my best man). It's
ALL a "make-believe" to Robeson if he doesn't accept
it or hates someone.

No cajones?

Tsk, tsk, tsk. "He-man challenges" oriented towards
overloaded testosterone levels and/or sexual ability?

In that case, Robeson has "no cojones" (nor ability to
spell any better in Spanish) since he hasn't gotten
up the courage to check out anything of mine, not
after five years of finding it out. He has gotten
that information more than once, publicly, in here.

Stebie would seem to prefer sitting around, doing
NOTHING but personal insults, denigrations, fake
humiliation-laughter, and almost countless BLUFFS
which are just LIES. He will NOT hesitate to call
others for "liars," perhaps because he has done so
much LYING of his own in the past?

Stebie is the ROLE-MODEL of today's U.S. amateur
radio Extra class licensee? [he is not chastised
by fellow Extras so he must be "approved by the
amateur community!"]

NOT a good role-model. Does NOT arouse any
"interest" (other than masochism) in joining the
"ranks" of amateur radio.