View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old May 16th 05, 05:39 PM
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 13 May 2005 11:00:26 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:


There has been no conclusive proof that
global warming is primarily the result of man's
influence over the environment.


(Yes, there is indeed conclusive proof.)


No there isn't, for the simple reason that we do
not have enough climatic history to determine
just how and when the climate shifts normally
as a reference before we can accurately
gauge the additional effects of humans.




The history of the earth's climate is well documented back to the
begining of the earth's creation...grammar school basic earth and
science taught this. Carbon dating confirms much ad plays a large part
of the techniques used to arrive at such widely accepted and mainstream
taught scientific facts.


Like I told Frank, science can tell us that, for instance, it was once
tropical in Montana, and that Glaciers covered much of the northern
United States during different time periods. This proves that the
earth's climate has vacillated in a fairly wide range. But what this
DOESN'T tell us is how much of the current global warming cycle can be
attributed to natural cyclic climatic changes, and how much of it is a
direct result of man made pollution. Without a point of reference, it
is extremely difficult to positively determine how much we are
changing the climate.


Chloroflourocarbons released by the burning of fossil fuels is directly
linked to global warming. Global warming was proved by the continual
shrinkage of the polar ice cap confirmed by 24-7 high tech monitoring of
such. Villages that reside in the frozen tundra watch their mountains of
ice shrink each year.


How much of that shrinkage would still be occurring without man made
pollution?


Some feel the same about poorly crafted laws, but you take issue with
those free-thinkers and it moves you toward the goblin that you are
unable to cast out and exercise of yourself.


Once again, you don't get it (Why should I be surprised?). You want to
get rid of what you refer to as "poorly crafted laws"? Then great! Go
for it! You have my support. But until then, you are bound to respect
and obey the current laws as they stand.

Dave
"Sandbagger"