View Single Post
  #48   Report Post  
Old May 27th 05, 12:16 AM
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 14:45:02 -0400, Dave Hall
wrote in :

On Wed, 25 May 2005 05:30:06 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:


Yea I know, our government has pledged it's true allegiance to the
"corporate machine", the free masons, Skull and bones, a "shadow
government" consisting of the descendants of Howard Hughes and the
"Old money" cronies of the industrial age and maybe even gray aliens
from Zeti-Reticuli.



Dave, you're a friggin' loon.


I'm just paraphrasing the conspiracy nuts who think our government is
in bed with big business and a host of other conglomerates.



Zeti-Reticuli?


You complain about the motives of our elected officials, yet insist
that our form of government is the only way to go. That seems to be an
inconsistent position to take. If you don't like your elected
officials, then vote them out next term. But don't complain if the
majority of voters differ from your opinion and override your
selection. That's what majority rule is all about. For every one who
gets what they want, someone else will be unhappy. That's life.



Even after -MONTHS- of discussion on the topic you -STILL- don't get
it. I'll make this -really- simple so even -you- can understand it:


Why, it's clear that YOU don't understand it.


This is not a "majority rule" country -- it's a country based on the
recognition of individual rights and freedoms.


Yes but every time we have an election, the majority picks the winner.



Wrong. The majority of -voters- choose. And the person they choose is
not the "winner", as if being a public official was some sort of
prize. It's not. It's a job. And their job is to work in the best
interests of -ALL- their constituents, not just those that voted them
into office.

And just for your information, your right to vote is granted by the
state, not guaranteed by the Constitution. There have been many
efforts to add a Constitutional amendment that would guarantee every
citizen the right to vote, but each attempt has been blocked by the
Republicans. That's just another tidbit you never hear about from the
"left-wing liberally biased news media".


You have the right to
think freely, to speak your opinions openly, to exercise religion as
you see fit, to make your own decisions without government influence,


Try to refuse to pay your taxes,



Now -there's- a great idea -- demand that the goverment protect your
country and your freedoms then squirm away when the bill comes.


cry fire in a crowded theater,



Are you so uneducated that you don't even know where that phrase
originated?


attempt to approach an elected official without permission,



Attempt to enter my house without permission and see what happens.


posses
contraband,



Contraband, by definition, is illegal.


or act in a manner which could be construed as suspicious.



You can blame Bush's Patriot Act for that one.


Your "rights" are limited, to some extent, by the government.



Of course rights have some limitations because there are circumstances
where exercising those rights can infringe on the rights of others.
How does gay marriage infringe on -your- rights, Dave?


Some of
your "rights" are really privileges (try to drive a car without a
license).



The lack of a driver's license doesn't prevent you from travelling
freely, just not with a motor vehicle. Regardless, you can drive a
motor vehicle without a license if you are on private property. Kids
do it all the time at the go-kart tracks. Farmers do it all the time
in their fields. Need more examples of your ignorance?


etc, etc; and these rights and freedoms are guaranteed -REGARDLESS- of
the opinions of any special-interest group, EVEN IF they represent the
majority, and EVEN IF you are a member of that "majority".


But if your guy loses on election day, tough cookies.



If your guy loses on election day, you don't lose the rights and
freedoms that are guaranteed by the Constitution.


The USA is NOT a democracy


No, it's a representative republic, loosely based on parliamentary
rule.

-- it's a country based on EQUAL RIGHTS and
FREEDOMS for EVERY citizen, the "Moral Majority" be damned.


You cannot give everyone what they want. Any fool (Except perhaps you)
knows that. When people group together with diametrically opposing
wishes and viewpoints, the largest group usually wins.



When you find a majority that is willing to give up the Constitution
then you let me know.


If you
don't like it, leave -- hell, I'll even buy your plane ticket! But if
you decide to stay, shut the **** up because you are effectively
undermining the integrity of this country with your lies, propoganda,
and warped interpretations of the Constitution; and I won't sit by and
let that happen because I took an oath to defend both the Constitution
and the country.


It's a shame that you took an oath to defend something that you don't
understand properly. You are a hopeless idealist.



So were the founding fathers.


Reality is a concept
that escapes you. You don't even understand that the establishment
clause does not establish separation of church and state. Nowhere are
the words separation of church and state in there.



You tried that spin once before and it didn't work. Why would you
think it's going to work if you use it a second time?


Either you are for the Constitution or you are against it. So it's
time for you to make a choice, Dave -- are you an American or not?


I am for it.



Excellent. Now learn something about it. For starters, try "The
Constitution of the United States: Its Sources and its Application" by
Thomas James Norton. This book should be kept on your desk right next
to your barely-used dictionary and over-worked computer.







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----