View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old May 28th 05, 02:33 AM
running dogg
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Li,Chanchun wrote:

by Lev Navrozov http://www.levnavrozov.com/

Fareed Zakaria [Pro-Jihadist], editor of Newsweek International
http://www.rogerlsimon.com/mt-archiv...deology_of.php , the
mainstream media, and the political establishment of the West today have
possibly never heard of Project 863, and Zakaria never calls the dictators
of China dictators and does not understand what dictatorship is. Thus he
claims that China is militarily "spending a fraction of what America does,
at most ten percent of the Pentagon's annual bill."


That's because the billions upon billions of dollars spent by the
Pentagon go down a bureaucratic rat hole. Totalitarian states always
have more efficient militaries than democracies, since the totalitarians
have conquest as their overarching goal, while democracy does not.

How does he know? Well, the Chinese leaders ( no, not dictators! ) publish
statistics ( no, not propaganda! ) on the subject.


The only link you posted was to Newsmax, which is not exactly an
unbiased source of info. Also, if RCI is "propaganda", how do you know
that the Chinese "statistics" aren't also propaganda? Like the old
saying goes, there are lies, damn lies, and statistics.

....
As a geostrategist, Hitler was a nonentity compared with Sun Zi, and the
Chinese dictators do follow Sun Zi's advice and not Hitler's example. They
avoid war with the United States now if it cannot be won. They concentrate
on the development of post-nuclear superweapons. They will strike only when
the war will be won before it is fought.
....
The Chinese global colony will work for, and will depend on, the dictators
of China, and certainly their power will be global.
....
....the post-nuclear superweapons being developed in China, in alliance with
Putin's Russia, such as molecular nano superweapons, will destroy the
Western means of nuclear deterrence. Zakaria and his Newsweek are living in
1945, while now it is 2005.


Molecular nano superweapons? I see somebody stayed up too late reading
Michael Crichton's novel "Prey". The Chinese do not need molecular nano
superweapons. They have a post nuclear superweapon, and it's called
fascist capitalism. China has succeeded in getting most of the world's
manufacturing capacity moved to China, thus giving them enormous
leverage over the West. If the US threatens to come to Taiwan's aid, the
Chinese can cut off supplies of boomboxes and T shirts. Don't laugh.
Most everything that Americans buy, the things that drive American
consumerism (and thus the American economy) are made in China. Deng knew
that China couldn't beat the West militarily, so he set out to beat them
economically. And he and his successors have done that.

....
I used to say years ago that the Western political establishment and
mainstream media are in a state of functional insanity, leading to the
suicide of the West.
....
For functionally insane, or abysmally ignorant and mentally retarded, like
the editor of Newsweek International, there will always be an occasion for
"optimism" until the Chinese dictators strike with post-nuclear weapons,
because they will know before they strike that they will win. Sun Zi said
it.


The Chinese have already struck with their post nuclear weapon, and
thanks to the boundless greed of Western CEOs they have won.


Full story: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...6/195554.shtml




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----