From: "bb" on Mon 30 May 2005 11:30
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
From: "bb" on Sun 29 May 2005 12:29
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Independently verifiable information...which you are too cowardly
to verify.
All you need is authentic documentation. Got any?
It's a "no use" request, Brian. He doesn't have any.
Gee, Lennie....
Only one line into your diatribe and we find you factless again.
You're making this way too easy, but thanks...
Factless???
Yep. Factless.
Prove Len and me wrong for once. Post your authentic documentation.
You've already been given authentic facts, Brian.
We've only seen your baseless assertions and claims. Post Docs.
Hmmmm...this can go on for years... :-)
1. Stebie has NO documentation so he can't post it.
2. Everyone is supposed to "take Stebie's 'word' for it."
3. Stebie will substitute Personal Insults for actual proof.
4. Stebie will then be asked (again) to show documentation.
5. Continue iteration by looping to (1)...ad nauseum.