Leo wrote:
On 31 May 2005 15:37:45 -0700, wrote:
Leo wrote:
On 31 May 2005 02:06:42 -0700, wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
Arf! Arf! wrote:
Some time back an anonymous poster calling himself "Leo"
appeared
here. Claimed he was a ham in Canada. You considered
him "legitimate".
Hmmm - probably because I am! ...... 
And why should "Arf! Arf!" be treated any differently?
Perhaps you could enlighten us on that, Jim......
OK
as I recall, you
yourself argued the other side of this point back in
November, when I
was not agreeing with you (back in the 'Near Space Science'
thread).....your exact words we
Didn't get past me. Leo sez he's a VE3. But no call, no last
name, no positive
ID, no website, no outside confirmation. Maybe he is, maybe
he ain't.
What part of that is not accurate, Leo? Maybe you are who you
say you are, and maybe you aren't. Maybe "Arf!" is who he says
he is - or maybe he ain't.
Hmmm - let's see here....I wasn't agreeing with you, so perhaps I am not legitimate.
Not at all. Your lack of verifiable ID means there's room for
doubt. Same for "Arf" or any other anonymous poster.
Yet here you make a case for Arf! Arf!'s existance
because he does agree with you.
There's as much reason to doubt his claims as there is to doubt
yours, Leo. And as little!
Please note that Len insists on calling "Arf!" names and comparing
him to Nigerian bank scammers, but does not do the same for
those who agree with him.
In addition, Len has posted here under a variety of screen names
(like "averyfine" and "averyfineman") often without any real ID.
If you want to remain anonymous, that's fine with me.
73 de Jim, N2EY