K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
Christy D wrote:
On 31 May 2005 15:40:05 -0700, bb wrote:


Christy D wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2005 12:07:05 GMT, Kim wrote:
[102 lines snipped]

The correctness of the original opinion is directly proportional to
the length of the attempted rebuttal.

inversely proportional?

No. The longer the rebuttal attempt, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct. Hence the direct proportionality.

Len will be pleased to here that.

"Len will be pleased to here that."...?!?!

(Since you seem to enjoy busting me for typos....)

Only when it's obvious that you're hallucinating.

I don't think you were paying attention, Brain...(Like THAT'S
new...)

Such baseless accusations (lies) you're always making.

Re-read what was written...Lennie will NOT be pleased...(Like
THAT'S new either!!!)

Steve, K4YZ

Pull your head out and re-read it yourself. You won't be pleased.

Christy said that the longer the reply, the more likely it is that the
original opinion was correct.

Len has long replies. Sometimes really, really long replies. Do you
want to argue that, too?