RadioBanter - View Single Post

June 3rd 05, 02:34 AM

wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Wed 1 Jun 2005 23:00

[the lonely sentinel...(SNIP)

At least you took the hint about your horrific behaviour vis-a-vis
parodies of the Tomb of the Unknowns...You may be teachable yet.

Lennie has repeatedly insisted that if I did certain things in the
Armed Forces, then I would be quick to brag about them and discuss them
readily. Since HE does it, EVERYONE must do it too.....

That's not the truth, but that's what Lennie has insisted.

That's simply untrue, Stebie.

It's absolutely true, Lennie.

You've stated that exactly before.

Stebie NEVER worked HF communications in the USMC.

THAT is abslutely UNRUE, Lennie, and you've been provided
references to verify same.

Indeed, he
was NEVER in any sort of radio communications tasks as a
helicopter ground maintenance crew.

I guess ann those COM/NAV Avionics MOS'es were for naught, eh?

Stebie still hasn't verified his CLAIM of being "Assistant"
NCOIC at a USMC MARS station.

That's not what I said, Lennie.

Get your facts straight.

Therefore, that being the case, and Lennie having failed to
discuss his successful procreation and subsequent rearing of offspring,
we can conclude that it never happened.

Stebie, in his RAGE and ANGER...(SNIP)

Just give us the kid's names, Lennie.

The rest is just subterfuge on your part to avoid the question.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. Both "Quitefine" and Stebie (Assistant NCOIC
of Rage and Anger among the PCTA) don't understand that
"young ones" are not necessarily just their "own" offspring.

No siad "their own" offspring, Lennie.

Why do you continue to avoid the fact that there are NO documented
(as per FCC records) of "children" being a regulatory burden on their
enforcement requirements.

Stebie, the self-appointed "ethnic puritan" of this newsgroup...(SNIP)

Another lie, Lennie. Stop lying.

couldn't make it on his own as a Purchasing Agent of a small
electronics company, yet claims/postures/implies that he
"knows" all about radio-electronics engineering, what the
engineers know, what the engineers do, etc., etc., etc.
CLAIMS. Brags. Posturing. Stebie's forte' as a mighty
macho morseman.

More lies.

Why does Leonard H Anderson continue to lie?

Where are these alleged "claims" of "know(ing) all about
radio-engineering..."

You've beena sked before. You never substantiate your claim.

YOU prove MY claim that you are a liar.

Again.

I make no "claim" of engineering. I AM one and have been for
many years. My professional occupation.

You claim to be an engineer. You refuse to produce any
references, other than a few by-lines in a failed Amateur magazine, to
show such work.

Stebie is a NURSE.

That's not quite correct.

I am GOOD Nurse.

The "surreal" part of Miccolis and Robeson's diatribes is that:

1. No pediatrician is required to be a "parent." There is NO
such "requirement" in any academic organization to "be a
parent" in ANY degreed/titled work involving children OR
procreation of children.

There's nothing "surreal" about it at all.

What's "surreal" is an unlicensed, childless old man petitioning
the FCC to enact an age limit where one is not called for.

2. "Quitefine" (Miccolis) seems to disregard laws of physics
in that ALL radios work by the SAME physical laws,
regardless of human designations as to their application.
[inconceivable that a claimed double-degree individual
would insist that ONLY licensed radio amateurs (who have
obtained a federal merit badge only in amateurism) can
express any opinion at all.

Leonard H. Anderson perpetrates yet ANOTHER lie.

NEVER ONCE has Jim Miccolis, myself, or any other licensed
participant in this fourm suggested anything of the like.

3. In the United States of America, ANY citizen has the RIGHT
to comment to their government on ANY law or regulation
REGARDLESS of whether or not they have any "license" or
other "authorization" to "operate" under some rules or
regulations.

Sure they do.

And it's also glaring apparent when the "petitioner" has absolutely
no idea what they are talking about.

That usually comes from not having any practical experience in the
subject matter they are commenting on. IE: Lennie and Amateur Radio
or Child Rearing.

4. Neither Miccolis ("Quitefine") nor Robeson have ANY
"authority" to RULE on U.S. amateur radio regulations,
yet the seek to bar, to subjugate, to eliminate ANYONE
BUT licensed radio amateurs from even talking about it.
Apparently those two control freaks do not understand
that NO FCC Commissioner or staff member is "required"
to possess an amateur radio license in order to offcially
regulate U.S. amateur radio.

You continue THIS misrepresentation despite there being absolutely
no evidence of ANYone except YOU trying to "enforce" some kind of
censorship...As a matter of fact, within the last 5 days alone you've
made no fewer than four direct demands to "shut up", "drop it", and
"LEAVE IT ALONE" and "just forget it"...

5. Miccolis-"Quitefine" has NOT YET stated how many offspring
HE has parented. He implies he has but the number, gender,
are all big unknowns. Robeson has only mentioned his
"offspring" from his second marriage...neglecting any
mention of "offspring" from his first, failed marriage.
Regardless of the NON-applicability of "offspring" as
the ONLY "authoritative experience" in discussing young
people, they implore (if not directly order) "offspring"
as a "prime requirement" to talk about young people.

Lies, lies and more lies.

I've mentioned all of my kids at one time or another, Lennie.

Tsk, tsk. A radio does NOT operate by different laws of
physics because some government agency designates it as
"amateur."

So what? "Physics" isn't the only consideration.

And Lennie's been asked to please show where ANYone, other than
him, has made said issue of it...

No answers.

TSK, TSK, TSK. MANY ANSWERS.

A blatant lie.

Provide JUST ONE quote rom ANY of us wherein we state that the
physics of radiowave propagation are any different for Amateur Radio
than any other service.

Apparently these two control
freaks do not have sufficient reading comprehension...or have
a psychological inability to separate their fantasies from
reality. They are continuously "making issues" of such
"clubhouse rules" where only THEY can "rule" yet neither one
has legal/lawful/actual authority to rule.

We'll see when you produce the above requested cite.

Once upon a time the idea that "teeners" using spark gaps and old
Model T ignition coils for "communications" would be nothing more than
a fad...

"SPARK," technically damped impulse oscillation, is FORBIDDEN
by law.

Sure it is.

But that doesn't negate my (factual) notation that early radio was
once deemed nothing mroe than a "fad", just like text messaging is for
kids today.

Jimmie boy,

There you go again. Why do you call names like that, Len?
Is there a reason you can't just call me "Jim", the way I
call you "Len"?

That might make you his "peer", Jim...

Can't have that!

PCTA Extra Double Standard. "Quitefine" and Stebie both
"allow" name-calling such as "PUTZ" and "gutless coward"
to others, yet object to their aliases or diminutive forms
of their given names.

Jim, in ANY "manifestation", has never called you ANY name.

Miccolis is NOT my "peer."

Acutally, in THIS forum, you are not HIS peer. You aren't even in
the same room, let alone sitting at the same table with him.

Stebie is a NURSE, has not even
worked IN any electronics engineering position...(SNIP)

True.

(UNSNIP)...nor has he done HF communications while in the military.

Not true.

And you said there must have been fraud involved. You accused ARRL and
the VEs involved of dishonesty. Right here. That's a fact. Shall I
repost those claims?

Tsk, tsk. I wrote, some time ago, that the ARRL "sins by omission."
They do so often, especially in their publications on the history
of radio. The ARRL over-emphasizes (from omitting other workers
in radio) the "role" that radio amateurs have played in the
evolution of radio communications.

Big snip of irrelevent historical diversion...

You point-blank called the League, in general, and the BoD in
particular, "dishonest".

You've been challenged over and over to provide SOME sort of
verifiable reference that at least corroborates a CLAIM of dishonesty,
let alone any facts to substantiate it.

The first use of Single Sideband techniques...(SNIP)

13 lines of non-pertinet diversion.

The ARRL has implied that quartz crystal frequency stability
owes its existance (especially after WW2) to "efforts by hams"
(in more pioneering). They neglect an overall electronics
industry need for stable frequency control. They neglect the
tremendous effort on wartime production of quartz crystal units
by the electronics industry - A million quartz units a month
in the last three years of WW2 and a national priority second
only to the Manhattan Project. By not mentioning what has
been known in the electronics industry they imply that hams
are responsible for the pioneering...which tells ham hobbyists
nice emotional things that make them feel important.

The FACTS are that this crystanl control WAS pioneered by Amateurs
and implemented by them.

The first use of VHF FM in mobile communications was pioneered
by commercial companies (Link and Motorola) and a few police
departments prior to WW2. That was vastly increased by the U.S.
military during WW2. The EM spectrum from VHF and up was opened
by the whole radio world just before and certainly after WW2.
Real history. The ARRL in QST magazine still refers to that
huge part of the EM spectrum as "the world above 50 MHz" as if
it is a sort of ghetto.

No...

The characteristics of radio wave propagation ARE different above
50Mhz. Perhaps if you were actually PRACTICED in the radio arts you'd
know this.

Where the HF part...(SNIP)

Seventeen lines of diversion.

The ARRL still want to ignore the obvious fact of the
overwhelmingly-most-increasing class in amateur radio being
Technicians. They want to gloss over the fact that most of
those are NO-CODE-TEST Technicians. That pleases the old
man hams who still think that morsemanship is "important" in
radio. Those old men (chronologically or in mindset) want to
fantasize their dreams of "being somebody." They like the
words that feed their fantasies...and that lets the League
hang onto them and keep them members.

More absolutley dishonest and deceitful rhetoric.

WHY does Leonard H Anderson continue to lie in the face of
overwhelming evidence to the contrary...?!?!

There are several more subjects on radio history that can be
shown, but the fantasizers and imaginers and those who want
to posture about their "importance" will object and call names.
Their "intellectual" response is to bring out idolated cases
that are supposed to "refute" challenges of the actual
sinning by omission by the mighty League.

Even a casual perusal of ARRL publications will show Lennie's
tales to be exactly that...tales...

Our local club recently added two new licensees...both 9....No
record, but yet more evidence that there ARE "young 'uns" entering
Amateur Radio.

Irrelevant, relatively isolated case. Apparently neither one
is the offspring of Stebie - who once touted the "ability" and
"dedication" of his own 9-year-old.

Not irrelevent. Factual. It's happening all over the United
States.

Even in Southern California.

The rest of us IN the radio-electronics industry will continue
doing our adult things.

Like what?

You've not done a single "adult" thing here. You lie...you
insult...you deceive...

We will pat you on the head when you
are nice and spank you when you misbehave.

No you won't.

Go to your room.

Yet another Lennieism for "shut up"

Steve, K4YZ