in other words i think he is trying to make a J pole into a coaxial
arrangement where the short part of the J wraps all the way around the pole.
personally it sounds like a lot of work to get rid of some small assymetry
caused by the gamma rod. the easier solution is a plain vertical with a
tuner to make the transmitter happy.

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... err, not to be confused with a "dipole beam", which is better
referred to as a "two element beam" to remove all confusion... grin

Warmest regards,
John

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Not that I am aware of, only thing is there is no where to "hang" that
T-Match--well, the mast I mentioned... and the fact the monopole is
absent the bottom half of a dipole element... this is especially
notable if the bottom end of the monopole is sitting on the ground...
that tends to remove all confusion... grin

Warmest regards,
John
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
John Smith wrote:
I should have pointed out, a T-Match requires a dipole, a few seem
to miss I had previously noted this is a monopole in question...

Is there any difference in a 1/2WL monopole element and a
1/2WL dipole element sans the T-Match? I can't think of any.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----