RadioBanter - View Single Post - N3CVJ denies failures, while Presidential Commission admitsfailures.

June 3rd 05, 05:11 PM

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:33:14 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
Disagreeing viewpoints aren't a problem for the majority..it's people
like you that mistakenly feel those who hold views contrary to your own
are somehow of the minority.

The last election pretty much confirms this.

Exactly, as a certain faction (like yourself) who voted for Bush
continue to mistakenly believe Bush had a majority of the people in the
US vote for him (he didn't) and that he achieved a mandate (again, he
did not, unless you can explain Gannon).
It's people like you that are unable to
come to terms with the fact that those large number of people who
disagree with you need not conform to what you feel is appropriate.

It is you who are in the minority, but somehow

think you are in the majority despite evidence,

Yes, evidence showing YOU are in the minority not the majority as
relates here among these pages. A perfect example is your shining belief
that speeders are criminals simply because they break a certain law,
which inevitably leads to your inability to distinguish between civil
and criminal infractions, even though you continue to confuse the two
and hold those who infract civil law the same as you do those who
infract criminal laws...as a criminal. Once again, the majority
disagrees with your ignorance.

such as the last couple of elections, which

show exactly the opposite. Democrats are still

losing seats in congress, despite the

unpopular war in Iraq. The desperation of

these same democrats who just can't

understand why they are losing, has become

so obvious, that they don't even try to hide

their crass, shrill, and unprofessional attacks

against Republicans.

Goes bothways,,,,like Delay and the comments he made regarding hatred
and his threats against judges that you couldn't even locate on your
own. In fact, you weren't even aware your own party acknowledged global
warming, so you have pretty much ascertained to the group that even
though you fancy yourself as educated on such subjects, you fall way
short.

That only makes the people rebel against

them even more.

At least one democrat understands this. It's

interesting to watch Hillary Clinton try to

reinvent herself as a "moderate",

As many, many republicans have distanced themselves from Bush...

and to distance herself from some of her more

vocal compadres. I guess she figures that we'll
all forget her former leftist politics, and that

farce that was supposed to be universal

heathcare.

That you consider healthcare for our own people as leftist politics
while we continue to offer free health care to all the Iraqis who simply
ask for it illustrates your level of comprehension.

The majority makes the rules. It's fine that the

rights of the minority are considered but it

makes no logical sense that the needs of that

minority outweighs the needs of the majority.

It doesn't matter which group. When rights are being taken away or
infringed upon, the needs you speak of far outweigh any perceived
majority. You come across as "majority is always right" when it has been
illustrated and accepted the majority has been wrong, especially with
this administration.

What is considered right and wrong is usually

relative and depends upon the perspective of

the majority.

Wrong. Rights are not inherent to any majority group, despite what they
and you feel. you are not special,....rights extend to all in this
country, not merely your imagined moral majority.

And, like it or not, from the time we are little

kids in school, we learned that life is not

always fair, and that those in the majority set

the fads, trends, and rules whether the rest of

us agree or not.

Take slavery for example.

I already did. Get your own examples to illustrate how majority rule is
not always right.

As another example, I personally think the TV

show, "American Idol" (and most "reality"

shows for that matter) is a complete waste of

time and a total example of vapid vicarious

superficiality, and voyeurism.

Exactly, yet, such audio voyeurism is something you find "juicy". In
fact, it was only a few years ago you claimed practicing audio voyeurism
turned you on, listening to underaged girls talk about sex on their
cordless phones. In this example, you not only had to be made aware that
intentional eavesdropping of private conversations is illegal and that
you were breaking the law, but you had to be clued in that the majority
of people would not find sex talk by underaged minor girls "juicy" as
you did.
This is where your ****ed up hypocrisy regarding morals and all that
bull**** you are forced to regurgitate makes you shine.

=A0=A0Like the Bush admin prostitutes religion, you do the same thing
with morals, invoking -your- values as the litmus test and justification
to sit in judgement of others.

And aren't you doing the same, only using a

different litmus test?

I never asked another adult to justify their actions. That's reserved
for you and those who feel they are entitled to something simply by
virtue of ignorance crossed with arrogance.

David T. Hall Jr.

N3CVJ

"Sandbagger"