In article ,
dg wrote:
Thanks for the writeup.
So, does the braid actually SHIELD or is it a consistent way to ensure
interference will cross both conductors?
Yes.
It performs both functions. It actually does provide a shielding, due
to the "skin effect" - RF resists flowing _through_ the body of a
conductor, and prefers to flow along its surface. It's very difficult
for RF to flow from the inner surface to the outer surface, as it
would have to travel through the thickness of the outer conductor.
That's probably the stronger factor in the interference resistance of
a coax. There's also some which comes from the symmetrical shape, I'd
guess, but I don't think it's anywhere near as much of an issue.
And along the same line of
thought, from the signal point of view on the inside of the cable everything
is kind of even because of the equal current-opposite direction?
Yup.
I am going
to contaminate my simple question by saying that I feel the braid is almost
incorrectly referred to as a shield-it is a functioning conductor necessary
for the signal to pass.
This is not an either-or sort of situation. In a single-shielded
coax, the braid (or hardline) performs both functions. It's a
fully-functioning conductor, and it also acts as a shield which
confines the signal to the inside of the coax. It's a floor wax *and*
a dessert topping!
Single-shielded cables can be somewhat "leaky" - the shielding
efficiency is not 100% if the outer conductor is not a solid, unbroken
surface. That's the reason why many cables are multiply-shielded...
the fields/current that leak out through the inner shields are
confined by the outer ones. In cables such as this, the inner
shields/braids/foils will be carrying almost all of the RF current,
and providing a lot of the shielding efficiency. The outer shields
will be carrying very little RF current - almost the only thing that
these outer shields do, is provide additional shielding.
At the other end of the spectrum are the so-called "leaky" coaxes,
which are deliberately designed with incomplete shields and which can
be counted on to "leak" a certain percentage of their RF energy out
into free space over a specific distance. These are often used to
couple RF into underground spaces (e.g. tunnels), along railroad
tracks, and so forth.
Also, how about this, reverse the polarity of the AC signal on the input of
the coax. Any difference on the performance of the cable? I mean, if its
AC the "shield" is carrying the same AC that the center conductor is right?
As far as the behavior of a given length of coax (away from the ends)
is concerned, there's no difference at all. The RF is AC and has no
polarity.
--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Hosting the Jade Warrior home page:
http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!