(Then why do you keep invoking sources that, by your own admission, have
no credibility? Are you attempting to achieve truth by repitition? Or
are you just plain stupid? )


Well, gentlemen understand that certain

personal experience contributes to the insight

on certain subjects.


Which necessitates the end result a personal opinion or interpretation,
not a reality or fact.

But if you want to turn every claim into an "It's

a lie until irrefutable proof positive is offered to
substantiate it", situation then ok, your point is

valid.



Not every claim, just your wild, unsolicited claims regarding
self-qualification claims you felt important enough to bring forth, but
for which not to provide even remote substantiation.

In that case, there's no further point in

debating, since that level of proof is usually

not forthcoming.

Not from you it sure isn't.