"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... actually, the only thing I have found that I can't allow for is
someone's sloppy key (you must decide what range of microseconds is a dit,
and what is the dah-- I have been kicking around the idea of a piece of
code to "sample" the senders "style" and automatically adjust--but that is
for tomorrow--and would be great if the code could automatically duplicate
his "sloppy style" and feed it back to him grin) but then--sloppy key
is no easier to copy with ear then by reader...
John
Depends on how you define easier. The ear can copy code so sloppy that no
computer/soundcard/software would ever decipher it.
Dee D. Flint, N8UZE
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...
"John Smith" wrote in message
...
I don't think there is a ham alive which can beat my keyboard, hooked to
a "electronic key" and sending morse, nor my sound card doubling as a
"code reader" and producing text on screen from cw...
You mean to tell me people actually use "real keys" still--gawd, I
thought all those sk tongue-in-cheek
Warmest regards,
John
When conditions are poor, even some one as poor at morse code as I am can
beat a "code reader" sound card/computer.
Dee D. Flint, N8UZE
|