Jim Kelley wrote:

It was a tongue-in-cheek reply, Roy. These problems always seem to end
up with a circulator in them at some point - clearly illustrating what
happens under entirely different circumstances. :-)

Thanks for the explanation. When Cecil has difficulty explaining a
circuit, he comes up with one which he can explain and tries to deflect
the discussion to it. This happens over and over and over -- it's really
a pain to try to keep steering the discussion back to the original circuit.

That leaves us with no one who claims to understand Cecil's
"explanation" of my simple circuit. Except, I guess, one guy who's on
vacation and some folks who don't read this newsgroup.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL