bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

The "internal fantasy" here, is yours. That being that you know
anything truly meaningful about Amateur Radio or any of it's associated
programs.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, there sure is lots of protesting and denial in your post, and
lots of claims of "not headline news" hostile actions. Len would be
pleased. Very pleased.

What protesting?

Can you give us some examples of what you consider hostile actions?

Engaged in direct fire with a hostile opponent. Exchanging
gunfire.

REAL gunfire...no BFA's.

Probably not. OK, I'll give some.

Cute. None of them correct.

Is that a hostile action?

I am sure that you wouldn't know "hostile action" if it greeted you
in the parking lot and poked you in the nose, Brian...

Steve, K4YZ

I'm sure you wouldn't know either.

Then you'd be wrong. (As if THAT were new...)

Got any proof?

Shall I demonstrate, or are you willing to accept that what would
transpire would cause you pain and suffering (along with some moderate
bleeding, easily controlled with ice and direct pressure?)

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, why would it cause me any pain and suffering? Do you wish to
harm me?

Shall I sign you up for a remedial reading course, Brain?

I was asking you what a hostile action meant to you. Prior to
yesterday, it meant getting sand in your eye.

No...to YOU it meant getting sand in your eye. Being a
non-combatant your whole career, I am sure that some sand in your eyes
or chapped hands from too much White-Out fluid was "trauma".

Steve, K4YZ