"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

"robert casey" wrote in message
ink.net...
Dan/W4NTI wrote:

Condensed version:

This $21,000 fine is for the apparent transmission of willful and
repeated
interference;
willful and repeated communications in which he had a pecuniary
interest;
willful and repeated failure to file requested information pursuant to
an
Enforcement Bureau directive; willful broadcasting; and willful failure
to
exercise control of his station.

Full Text:

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554



In the Matter of
File No. EB-04-BS-111
Glenn A. Baxter NAL/Acct. No. 200532260001
RR 1 Box 776 FRN 0013164975
Belgrade Lakes, ME 04918

Licensee of Amateur Radio
Station K1MAN



It's real. See
http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-259301A1.html

I wouldn't have thought that mentioning your web site that
happens to have business matter in it on the air if you
didn't mention about the business on the air to be a
violation. But the other stuff is clearly violations.

It's how you mention it. Basically he specifically mentioned going to his
web site to buy things on which he made a profit. If he had simply said
"see the full text of the article on" say a recent FCC ruling that
affected ham radio, it would not have been a problem even if he had an ad
right next to the article.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

The blapster (MAN) has been trying for decades to drag the FCC into Federal
Court. He probably did all of that with that goal in mind.

I don't and never have thought Glen to be stupid. Just crazy.

Dan/W4NTI