Leo wrote:
 On 19 Jun 2005 04:48:01 -0700,  wrote:
 Leo wrote:
  On 18 Jun 2005 17:30:57 -0700,  wrote:
  Leo wrote:
   On 18 Jun 2005 10:41:47 -0700,  wrote:
  
   From: Mike Coslo on Fri 17 Jun 2005 22:07
   
   Dave Heil wrote:
     wrote:
   snip
  
      Seig Heil!!!              :-)
  
   Next up, Jim will once again attempt to invoke Mr.
   Godwin's rule.
  "attempt"? Hardly!
  snip
  Attempt, definitely.  Because, as has been demonstrated many   times
  before, the discusion will continue regardless of whether
  Godwin's impotent rule has been 'invoked' or not.
 The version of Godwin's rule that I use says that the person
 who uses stoops to calling their opponent "Hitler", "Nazis"
 or references to them, has lost the argument. That the
 discussion
 continues is irrelevant. Len has lost the argument.
 I see.  Thanks for clearing that up, Jim - for a minute there,  I was
 afraid that you hadn't accomplished anything useful there!
So it wasn't an "attempt" but a success.
  But it just had to be done, didn't it?
 No, it didn't. But I did it anyway.
 Of course you did.  You had to!
Nope. I chose to.
 Is there a problem with that? Do you think Len's slurs
 are acceptable behavior?
 There are several folks here whose 'slurs' and language are
 much worse
 than this example
Yes, Len has done worse....
 (a reference to the bumbling and
 comical 'Nazis' on "Hogan's Heroes")
The Fuhrer was a feldwebel in WW1
 - always has been, always will be.
That claim is incorrect. Usenet is not eternal.
 It's not my job
 to run around and point that out all day every day.
You have avoided the question.
Do you think Len's slurs are acceptable behavior?
 It's not my job to point that out to each and every participant  on this group Jim - is it yours?  Why?
Your argument seems to be that since Len will probably exhibit
his typical immature ethnic-slur Godwin-violating bad-pun
Unknown-Soldier-insulting jackass behavior anyway, there's no
point in pointing out when he is, indeed, exhibiting his typical
immature ethnic-slur Godwin-violating bad-pun Unknown-Soldier-insulting
jackass behavior. Is that about right?
Perhaps you have a valid point, since if what Len seeks is
attention, pointing out his typical immature ethnic-slur
Godwin-violating bad-pun Unknown-Soldier-insulting jackass behavior
gives him that attention.
 (73 de Jim etc. sig missing again)
Not missing - omitted.
The original meaning of "73" is "a friendly greeting
between operators". In the context of amateur radio,
this means between amateur radio operators.
It would be inappropriate to use the greeting to
someone who is not an amateur radio operator.
 73, Leo