wrote:
Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:
In my opinion, the only problem is in drawing incorrect inferences
about the behavior of nature based on readings taken from the meter,
and from some of the less than fortunate terminology which is
associated with the meter readings.

Spot-on, Jim.

What is the technical content here? I don't see a single equation. The
moral seems to be "draw no conclusions because they might be
incorrect". Whatever happened to the scientific method where a premise
is tested against reality?

You lost it somewhere. The moral is "draw no conclusion that could be
incorrect".

--
73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek