thanks for responding Ian:

No doubt your correct about alot, and clasically speaking i wouldn't
argue, however 2 points

firstly my comparsion to einstein wasn't regarding myself i was making a
joke that my 'theories /ideas' are often thought of as crazy but who
knows

regarding your being so firm saying that rf is typically just
conventional physics, I dunno..
who says it's confirmed to our space??

we are only just begining to see the possibilities that things in our
deminsion/ or time "e space" do in fact have relationships with 'other
' things, some of which might be having effects out of phase, 'time' or
having somthing corresponding in another dimension so to speak (for
example)

it's not unfathomable to think that the sum of our current knowledge
might no be infinate, perhaps we've simply failed to measure ? who
knows what tomorrows proved new theories will bring?

already here waves(rf) conventional were compared to photonic
'energy'(now thats something few can understand alone) and those photos
do some really strange things w/regards to the above (even more strange)

conventionally speaking your correct of course, but i always keep an
open mind towards possibilities, and crazy theories, since rf is still
such a not understood umm blackhole or i am just crazy

yeah i am just a nutty non scientific type throwing wackey ideas i have
into that round black hole hoping that i'll find the right sized peg(my
best asylm analogy rich) not cause i want to be known, but it's just
fun for me to ponder these things

i've already learned alot from you ian thanks again rich and cecil
thanks too


m
In article ,
Ian White GM3SEK wrote:

ml wrote:

then i think quantum things but even if i expertly understood all
these parts, would I have the answers??

You don't need to "think quantum things" about this problem.

The discovery of quantum physics was that energy levels aren't
continuous. A "system" (whatever it may be) can only have certain levels
of energy - in-between energy levels are not allowed. To change between
energy level, the system must emit or absorb quanta of energy.

Quantum energy E is related to frequency (f, Hz) by E = h*f, where h is
Planck's constant = 6.6 x 10^-34 Joule seconds.

At 10MHz, the quantum energy is 0.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 0066
joules. This is so small that - for all practical purposes - ANY energy
level is possible, and quantum effects at radio frequencies are so small
they are irrelevant.

So quantum physics has just *confirmed* that, at radio frequencies,
classical EM physics is all you need to know.


hey people thought people like einstein were nutz too and he was smart

The question is: are there any Einsteins here?

Antennas and transmission lines are home territory for classical EM
physics, right in the middle of our map of existing knowledge. There are
still lots of interesting new things to be discovered there; but we know
in advance that they MUST join up with the existing map, because it
surrounds us on every side.

Anybody who imagines he's an Einstein, exploring the outer boundaries...
is just plain lost.