On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:10:51 GMT, ml wrote:

regarding your being so firm saying that rf is typically just
conventional physics, I dunno..
who says it's confirmed to our space??

Hi Myles,

He showed it to a precision of 34 places. Do you need more?

we are only just begining to see the possibilities that things in our
deminsion/ or time "e space" do in fact have relationships with 'other
' things, some of which might be having effects out of phase, 'time' or
having somthing corresponding in another dimension so to speak (for
example)

If by we, you mean astronomers, and if by things, you mean galaxies.
This is where 34 places begins to add up to serious values, like a
boost of 1 MPH acceleration averaged over 100 quadrillion stars. Hold
the key down on your amplified transmitter for a century, and your
antenna might create as much thrust pressure that a snail expends in a
femtosecond. If quantum effects were significant, then the weight of
one more microbe from a nearby sneeze would immediately crush you as
much as the added burden of Atlas.

it's not unfathomable to think that the sum of our current knowledge
might no be infinate, perhaps we've simply failed to measure ? who
knows what tomorrows proved new theories will bring?

Who knew that Flying machines would move millions of people?
Certainly not Plato, but knowing it then wouldn't upgrade his seat to
first class now.

already here waves(rf) conventional were compared to photonic
'energy'(now thats something few can understand alone) and those photos
do some really strange things w/regards to the above (even more strange)

Strange? Only the way Cecil describes it. You may have as well
studied drug abstinence from Elvis.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC