m II wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
m II wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:


If we called them terrorists, we would have to shoot them. Take your
choice.

I see you leave no option for open trials in a public court. Public servants in
a free society shouldn't have to hide everything they do from the tax paying
public. having gulags out of your country in order to circumvent your own laws
is NOT right or moral.

mike



They are not soldiers, as Iraq doesn't have a legitimate army now
that their old movement is gone. That leaves terrorists or enemy
combatants. Take your pick. We can detain enemy combatants, while a
terrorist places no value on life. Not yours, mine or his. They are
cowards who think they will gain fame and glory by dying while killing
others. They are mentally ill. They do nothing productive for the rest
of the world. They kill people, destroy property and the lives of those
around them at every turn.


But that is exactly what a lot of the world thinks about the US now. Invading

the only true thing in this dreck alot of the world does hate the US,
they did before Iraq, I don't care if they Hate US as long as they fear
US

another country that did nothing to deserve it, except for the sin of having
oil, was about as low as a government can go. I can see the Germans in WWII
calling the Polish resistance 'enemy combatants'. Calling something a name you'd
like it to be, doesn't make it so.

They were and the resistance was not entitled to any favorable
treatment, The detainees could lawfully have been shot when taken


The attack on Iraq and Afghanistan was and is an abomination perpetrated by evil
doers for their own private and corporate gain. You know it. Don't fight the
truth. Give in to the *good* side of the Force..

bull****



mike