an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote
In reading the newsgroup lately I get the impression that the the
relitvely new 60 band does NOT premit Morse Encoded CW in at lea=
st
some region of the band.
Is my impression corect.
There is no 60M "band". US amateurs are allocated 5 discreet 2K8J3=
E channels
Auf Anglish Bitte?
Why?
so it can be understood
I understood him fine the first time...OF course I KNOW a bit
about Amateur rules and regulations, the focus of this forum byt the
way, so it was a "no brainer".
You can't do English any better than you could Serbo-Croatian.
there is a lie, I Do English much better
No. You don't.
He answered your question exactly.
no he did not answer it the question was about CW
He absolutely answered your question. Precisely. Accurately.
Civilly.
I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't allowed but you=
I
guess answering a question si too much for you
He did answer your question. Precisely.
no he did not answer it the question was about CW
He absolutely answered your question. Precisely. Accurately.
Civilly.
Perhaps your "higher standards" you refered to in another thread
aren't so high, eh?...
any standard is higher than standard of proof for yourself, even your
standard of proof for others
Well...You spelled all of the words correctly....Now if they were
just organized into a coherent sentence...
centered on 5332 kHz, 5348 kHz, 5368 kHz, 5373 kHz and 5405 kHz.
Geeze, Markie...He gave you the specific mode AND frequencies
authorized.
in gibberish
"Gibberish" to an idiot, perhaps.
Seems it's perfectly clear in Part 97.
So is this going to be another "rights" issue for you? Is the FCC
going to have to write a "Radio Rules for Dummies" book just for idiots
like you?
And then you don't even have the good courtesy to thank him.
I rarely thank people when they are being discourtesous
Then why didn't you thank Hans for giving you the information you
requested?
He gave you the EXACT frequencies and modes authorized on 60
meters and did so without a single abrasive, discourtesous adjective or
suggestion.
Good thing you didn't ask about power limitations...he would've
had to use a REAL technical term...ERP...That would ahve REALLY
confused you!
you still can't seem to spell have today Stevie what is it?
the reason I did not ask is of course I did not need to know...(SNIP)
So you just embarked on this mission to provide yet another
opportunity for us to make fun of you? Was it GOOD for you...?!?!
(UNSNIP)...I also
assumed it was 1.5 KW like the rest of the ARS, but then since i am not
using the freqs it doesn't matter
(1) If you're not "using the freqs", why the inquiry in the first
place, and
(2) There you go assuming again.
Look at all the embarrassment you could have saved yourself if you
had just put "Part 97" into the search engine and read it for yourself.
And if you had problems with the emission designators, well,
that's on line and public information too.
Just like your address is.
Steve, K4YZ
|