K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

In reading the newsgroup lately I get the impression that the t=
he
relitvely new 60 band does NOT premit Morse Encoded CW in at l=
east
some region of the band.

Is my impression corect.


There is no 60M "band". US amateurs are allocated 5 discreet 2K8=
J3E channels

Auf Anglish Bitte?

Why?

so it can be understood

I understood him fine the first time...OF course I KNOW a bit
about Amateur rules and regulations, the focus of this forum byt the
way, so it was a "no brainer".

You can't do English any better than you could Serbo-Croatian.

there is a lie, I Do English much better

No. You don't.

Bull**** another Stevie boy lie. I know nothing of SerboCroatian , I
know something of english therefore I know English much better


He answered your question exactly.

no he did not answer it the question was about CW

He absolutely answered your question. Precisely. Accurately.
Civilly.

no he answered it vaguely incompletely and arrogantly


I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't allowed but y=
ou I
guess answering a question si too much for you

He did answer your question. Precisely.

no he did not answer it the question was about CW

He absolutely answered your question. Precisely. Accurately.
Civilly.

no he answered it vaguely incompletely and arrogantly

you realy like cuting and pasting I can do it to Stevie boy


Perhaps your "higher standards" you refered to in another thread
aren't so high, eh?...

any standard is higher than standard of proof for yourself, even your
standard of proof for others

Well...You spelled all of the words correctly....Now if they were
just organized into a coherent sentence...

it is perfectly coherent and in exactly proper for spoken english,
which the from i use online as I have said before, again and again


And of course it is true Any standard of proof is higher than yours for
yourself


centered on 5332 kHz, 5348 kHz, 5368 kHz, 5373 kHz and 5405 kHz.

Geeze, Markie...He gave you the specific mode AND frequencies
authorized.

in gibberish

"Gibberish" to an idiot, perhaps.

I suspectwith some effort i could PHDs to whom it be gibberish


Seems it's perfectly clear in Part 97.

So is this going to be another "rights" issue for you? Is the FCC
going to have to write a "Radio Rules for Dummies" book just for idiots
like you?

GIGO

Must you rant and rave so much


And then you don't even have the good courtesy to thank him.

I rarely thank people when they are being discourtesous

Then why didn't you thank Hans for giving you the information you
requested?

Because he didn't


He gave you the EXACT frequencies and modes authorized on 60
meters and did so without a single abrasive, discourtesous adjective or
suggestion.

he did not answer the question he rudely choose to answer a different
question

No one asked for freqs no asked about any mode beside CW


Good thing you didn't ask about power limitations...he would've
had to use a REAL technical term...ERP...That would ahve REALLY
confused you!

you still can't seem to spell have today Stevie what is it?

the reason I did not ask is of course I did not need to know...(SNIP)

So you just embarked on this mission to provide yet another
opportunity for us to make fun of you? Was it GOOD for you...?!?!

I did not and do not need to know what power levels are ok on 60 M I am
not allowed to transmit there

I don't ask for unneeded data


(UNSNIP)...I also
assumed it was 1.5 KW like the rest of the ARS, but then since i am not
using the freqs it doesn't matter

(1) If you're not "using the freqs", why the inquiry in the first
place, and

To determine if I was correctly following folks when it seemed that CW
has forbidden on a band that requires a CW test for use

I care about CW testing surely you have noticed


(2) There you go assuming again.

Look at all the embarrassment you could have saved yourself if you
had just put "Part 97" into the search engine and read it for yourself.

Bull****

A simple yes no instaed of reading through mind numbing legalese


And if you had problems with the emission designators, well,
that's on line and public information too.
=20
Just like your address is.
=20
Steve, K4YZ