an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

You can't do English any better than you could Serbo-Croatian.

there is a lie, I Do English much better

No. You don't.

Bull**** another Stevie boy lie. I know nothing of SerboCroatian , I
know something of english therefore I know English much better

Then prove it.

He answered your question exactly.

no he did not answer it the question was about CW

He absolutely answered your question. Precisely. Accurately.
Civilly.

no he answered it vaguely incompletely and arrogantly

Then you are without question or consideration an absolute liar.

He gave you the specific frequencies allowed and the mode allowed
on them. Simply saying "single side band" is not completely accurate.

I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't allowed but you I
guess answering a question si too much for you

He did answer your question. Precisely.

no he did not answer it the question was about CW

He absolutely answered your question. Precisely. Accurately.
Civilly.

no he answered it vaguely incompletely and arrogantly

Then you are without question or consideration an absolute liar.

He gave you the specific frequencies allowed and the mode allowed
on them. Simply saying "single side band" is not completely accurate.

you realy like cuting and pasting I can do it to Stevie boy

Nope.

You really like repeating the same lie over and over.

My answer to the assertion is the same answer.

Perhaps your "higher standards" you refered to in another thread
aren't so high, eh?...

any standard is higher than standard of proof for yourself, even your
standard of proof for others

Well...You spelled all of the words correctly....Now if they were
just organized into a coherent sentence...

it is perfectly coherent and in exactly proper for spoken english,
which the from i use online as I have said before, again and again

No. It's not.

And of course it is true Any standard of proof is higher than yours for
yourself

Still senseless.

centered on 5332 kHz, 5348 kHz, 5368 kHz, 5373 kHz and 5405 kHz.

Geeze, Markie...He gave you the specific mode AND frequencies
authorized.

in gibberish

"Gibberish" to an idiot, perhaps.

I suspectwith some effort i could PHDs to whom it be gibberish

See what I mean...an idiot!

Seems it's perfectly clear in Part 97.

So is this going to be another "rights" issue for you? Is the FCC
going to have to write a "Radio Rules for Dummies" book just for idiots
like you?

GIGO

Must you rant and rave so much

You're the ranter and raver here, Mark.

You asked a question requiring specific information.

That question was answered, but then you insulted and demeaned the
person who provided it just becasue YOU are a feeble minded idiot.

GIGO doesn't apply. You were given the right information. You
simply were (and remain)too stupid to understand it.

And then you don't even have the good courtesy to thank him.

I rarely thank people when they are being discourtesous

Then why didn't you thank Hans for giving you the information you
requested?

Because he didn't

Then you are without question or consideration an absolute liar.

He gave you the specific frequencies allowed and the mode allowed
on them. Simply saying "single side band" is not completely accurate.

He gave you the EXACT frequencies and modes authorized on 60
meters and did so without a single abrasive, discourtesous adjective or
suggestion.

he did not answer the question he rudely choose to answer a different
question

Then you are without question or consideration an absolute liar.

He gave you the specific frequencies allowed and the mode allowed
on them. Simply saying "single side band" is not completely accurate.

No one asked for freqs no asked about any mode beside CW

Just admit you were too stupid to understand and to narrowminded
to take a second to process what was given you.

You reacted the way ALL spolied brats do.

So you just embarked on this mission to provide yet another
opportunity for us to make fun of you? Was it GOOD for you...?!?!

I did not and do not need to know what power levels are ok on 60 M I am
not allowed to transmit there

I don't ask for unneeded data

Good.

Because you obviously were too stupid to understand the data you
DID ask for.

(UNSNIP)...I also
assumed it was 1.5 KW like the rest of the ARS, but then since i am not
using the freqs it doesn't matter

(1) If you're not "using the freqs", why the inquiry in the first
place, and

To determine if I was correctly following folks when it seemed that CW
has forbidden on a band that requires a CW test for use

FCC regulations require Morse Code competency for ANY Amateur
operating on ANY frequency below 30Mhz.

I care about CW testing surely you have noticed

No...You care about getting as much as you can with as little
effort expended.

You proved that years ago.

(2) There you go assuming again.

Look at all the embarrassment you could have saved yourself if you
had just put "Part 97" into the search engine and read it for yourself.

Bull####

A simple yes no instaed of reading through mind numbing legalese

It was only mind numbing to you...Mind numbing because you were
either too stupid or too ignorant to understand it.

I say "stupid or ignorant" because you immeidately made a fool out
of yourself over the answer instead of doing two minutes worth of
research.

Nothing we didn't expect.

Steve, K4YZ