K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

...of any restriction of modes on 60m nor any
mention of 60 metter in part 97 at all...

=A797.303(s) is very clear on the topic. You're correct that it do=
esn't
specifically call it a "60 metter" band, but it DOES spell out in d=
etail the
mode restrictions and other technical requirements and restrictions=
of the
frequencies I think you call "60 metters".

Markie doesn't like getting his nose just RUBBBED in
something...he has to have it slammed, poked, jabbed and nearly ripped
off until the point gets through to him.

See y'all on "60 metters"...! All except Markie and Lennie, that
is!

as is normal for HIm Steve chooses to post without bothing with the
subject

break

It had everything to do with the subject, Markie. You.

Nope the Subject was amonoulous data coming fromt the FCC on the Rules
of the ARS

For the last 2 weeks I've been berating you for your childish,
uncivil behaviour towards Hans. You treated him rudely, and there was
no excuse for it.

wether I was or wasnt has nothing to do with what posted and accesd
through FCC.gov


Hans already gave you the exact information that you needed...And
THEN you said "I don't need to know that since I can't operate
there"...Well...Obviously it's an issue for you since you DO keep going
"there".

So instead of letting it drop, you further exacerbate the issue by
opening a whole new thread and get your nose rubbed even deeper in your
arrogance and ignorance.

no I was comening on content of FCC.gov

you are the one that never let anything drop

You are still harrasing me about changing ISP's In 1998

This had zero-point-squat to do with your "cmoment about Part
97"....It had everything to do with you trying to find some way out of
the spanking you were taking for your behaviour. You were looking for
SOME vector to allow you to redirect ANY of that to Hans.

nope

It didn't work. Landed right back in YOUR lap AGAIN.
=20
Steve, K4YZ