"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message
...
"Lucky" wrote:


"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message
...
"Lucky" wrote:


"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message
...

[...] Value? yep. Value for money? yep.
Absolutely a good value? Not even close.
[...]

I'll say it again: It *is* value for the money, but it is *not* an
absolute value.
[...]
Hi

I have about 10 radios. For $425, the R75 is my best rig.
[...] Point me to a decent
receiver for $425. Please, show me so I can buy it.

You can't read, can you?

Try again. slowly.

For. The. Money. It. Is. A. Good. Value.

(rolls eyes)

--
Eric F. Richards

"...there are moments (as when Gore speaks... slowly... and... heavily....
to... grown... men... and... women... so... that... you'd... swear...
he...
was... trying... to... explain... Wittgenstein... to... three... year...
olds) when you have the disconcerting thought that the vice president may
come from Mars."
Lance Morrow,
http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/...rrow7_21.a.tm/

I get your point Eric. I was trying to go beyond the arguement of it just
being a good value by showing how good it is regardless of price. It's good
radio period, not just for the "value".

Lucky