Michael wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Michael wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Lucky wrote:
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message
...

"Lucky" wrote:


"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message
m...

"Michael" wrote:


I find that there isn't anything that I can hear with
the R-75 that I can hear with more expensive radios.

That's true. Images, birdies, artifacts, intermodulation
products --
it's all there.

The R-75 is dumpster fodder. Value? yep. Value for money? yep.
Absolutely a good value? Not even close.

You need to experience a truly good radio. See
http://www.sherweng.com for some guidelines.



I personally think you made a fool out of yourself with your drivel
and
that's about it.

Lucky


You can believe that all you want. I owned an R75 for years. When=
I
was selling it at a hamfest, Bob Sherwood came by and I offered it =
to
him, and he just laughed.

I'll say it again: It *is* value for the money, but it is *not* an
absolute value.

For me, the issue that is important is front-end overload. There a=
re
several flamethrowers that put millivolts worth of signal on my
antennas. I don't have problems with close-in dynamic range... no =
one
should really have problems with sensitivity on HF.

The R75 was nothing but images below 10 MHz without both preamps off
and the attenuator on.

--
Eric F. Richards

"Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- Myron Glass,
often attributed to J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940


Hi

I have about 10 radios. For $425, the R75 is my best rig. I have no
problem with images here in Miami. There are many Hams down here and
lots
of the time the bands are terrible. But, with my R75, I can clean t=
he
signal up very well and enjoy the conversations. I can't do this wi=
th
my
other rigs. Here they. They are not all very good but I started out=
as
a
novice.

1] Kenwood 5000
2] Lowe HF-150
3] JVC NRD 525
4] Yaesu FRG-7
5] TenTec 320-D for DRM
6] Yaesu FRG-7700
7] Nasa Target HF3
8] Kenwood QR-666 {really the R300}
9] Degen 1103
10] Icom R75

I would say the next best rig is the HF-150 then the 5000 and 525 a=
re
about equal with the 525 giving you a few more options. If I mean
business I use the R75. All I know is that I bought a brand NEW rad=
io
with **DSP and **dual PBT plus easy computer control for $425. Just
being
able to mix and match filters is superb. The built in 2 level pre-a=
mp
works great.

How in the freaken world can you argue this point? How? Point me to=
a
decent receiver for $425. Please, show me so I can buy it.



Not to state the obvious, but he did concede that, for the money,
R-75
is a value. What he's saying, what I've said, and what has been
repeated
here over the last few years, is that R-75 is not an absolute value.
For
$425, yes, it's a good deal. But as an absolute value, it's like most
ICOM's (of which I've owned several and loved every one of them):
It's
potential is not realized until it's been modified. No one is saying
that
it's a bad radio. No one is saying that it's not worth having, and t=
hat
it's not a strong player, and to reiterate for those in Rio Linda, F=
OR
THE
MONEY, it's a good value.

It's just not all it can be.

As much as I loved my R-71, I was very much looking forward to R-7=
5's
release. And was ready to close a deal with Universal as soon as it =
was
available. But after playing with one for the better part of a day, I
was
less than impressed. And went in another direction. A direction I've
been
very pleased with. In fact, I've not bought a new radio since.

I liken ICOM's to cars at the drag strip. Do you know why there are
so
many Fords and Chevy's are used as racing platforms? =C5nd you don't=
see
so
many Lincoln's and Cadillacs? Not because the Fords and Chevy's are
superior, but because they're a good buy for the money. For an
economical
outlay, you can buy a platform, that when modified to taste becomes
precisely the car you want. Exactly built and tuned to the applicati=
on
you've chosen for it. A Lincoln would be a better platform. Sturdier,
more
finely tuned suspension. But with fewer mods available, and at
dramatically higher cost.

I"ve seen Lincoln's at the race track. And I watched one mop up a
Taurus
in the quarter mile, but at 20 times the outlay for a dragstrip car.

ICOMs are solidly built, and decent performers. Like entry level
domestic cars, their design has great potential for performance. But
production cost shortcuts and economies produce a product that could=
be
far more than it is. Requiring modification to extract the performan=
ce
built into the design. When you're finished, add up price of the rad=
io,
the cost of the mods, shipping, old battery and recappable tires, and
you've got a radio that's actually more expensive than it would have
been
had they not cut the production corners in the first place.

But then, at least, the absolute value of the radio would be
established.

There's nothing wrong with you loving your R-75. And as Eric has s=
aid
more than once, it IS a good value for the money.

It's just that as it comes out of the box, it's potential is not
realized. And for many users, that's a deterrent to ownership.


Not only is the R-75 a good value for dollar, it is a good absolute va=
lue
as
well. Price aside, it is a good radio period. It is well built,
sensitive,
selective, has a good user interface, is adequate for program listenin=
g,
can
be very good for program listening with simple mods, and it is
outstanding
for utility and DX'ing. For me, it doesn't make the sense god gave a m=
ule
to
malign the R-75 because after market mods can improve the performance =
of
the
audio definition and the function of the sync detector should you deci=
de
to
do so. The R-5000 is a great radio and it doesn't even have a sync
detector.
The NRD 545 is a good radio and to my ear, even through an external
speaker
the audio is hollow and tinny for any radio, let alone one with a price
tag
that is so high.

I have used the R-75, R-5000, R8, R8b and have some time on an NRD-545.
Going by actual usage, I can honestly say that NONE of those radios are
"WONDER RADIOS" in comparison with the others. The all have their
strengths,
but none of them will work miracles in comparison to other ones. They =
are
all capable radios. Of all of those radios, the one that I'd prefer to
have
for DX'ing and or utility would be the R-75. For program listening, I'd
take
the R8b. The audio quality itself is not all that much better then my
Kiwa
modified R-75, but the ssb selectable AM sync on the R8b can be a marv=
el
for
cutting out not just fade distortion but cutting out QRM completely fr=
om
a
signal above or below. I can also do the same thing with QRM using my
Sony
7600gr too !!!!

So.... Those are facts. The R-75 is a good performer in some categori=
es
and
an OUTSTANDING performer in most others. How can you say it is not an
absolute value ???

In reading posts from people that COMPULSIVELY malign the R-75 and obs=
ess
over the perceived AM sync deficiency ad nausium, it seems like it is =
the
self justification of a person who spent way more money then the R-75
costs
on their rig.

Or is it self justification on your part because you either don't have =
or
don't
want to spend the money for a better rig?

No... Not true at all. I'd spend more money on a better rig. I was going
to buy an NRD-545 not too long ago. I tried one out on loan from a frien=
d=2E
Although I loved the way it looked and I loved the way the controls were =
set
up, I thought the weak audio was a serious distraction. Still... That is
not why I didn't get one. I was primarily looking for a better DX'ing
radio. I'd deal with lesser audio if the DX'ing abilities were better th=
en
my R-75. I came to the realization after testing out the NRD-545 that
noting could help me DX' any better due to the high noise floor here in
north NJ. I dont need a new rig, I need to move to another area.

I always did want to see the American southwest. May be Arizona :-)

Yes, it's an OK radio, but come on...

OK.. I know you like your R8 series, but do you really think the R8 series
is better then the R-75 for DX'ing. ??? The R8 series is only WAY better
then the R-75 for one thing and one thing only. And not... not program
listening. With my Kiwa mods and external speaker, it does well for prog=
ram
listening. Although not too many people mention it when comparing the R8
with the R-75 because everyone is pointing out the synch thing, the R-75
SUCKS ON ICE for medium wave DX'ing. It's way too noisy. I loved using =
all
of the R8 series for MW, especially the R8b. I thought the R8b's AM synch
was the cats ass.

Regardless, you cant tell me the R8 or R8a or R8b is better at SW DX'ing
then the R-75.

Michael

Do you have an opinion as to whether the R75 is superior to the AOR
7030+ for DX purposes? I ask because the 7030+ and the R8B are usually
described as about even in this regard. (I'd actually give a slight
edge to the R8B, but that may just reflect some of my own personal
preferences.) If this is correct, and if the R75 "beats" the R8B, then
it should also beat the 7030+.

Does that seem right to you? If so, which receiver currently on the
market would one have to buy to beat the R75? An RX-340 maybe?

Steve