Jim Kelley wrote:
And that is a wonderful example of the rhetorical way to hold your hands
over your ears and hum. :-)

Please note the technical content of your posting. Once you
derived the interference equations on your own, the physical
implications are clear and you apparently cannot come up with
a disagreement between us since my conclusions were based
on those very physics energy equations that you derived from
first principles. I am not aware of any further disagreement
between us. You are welcome to discuss what you perceive as
a disagreement either here or by email.

To summarize: EM energy cannot travel at any speed except the
speed of light, cannot exist without energy, and that energy
must be conserved. If reflected energy doesn't reach the source,
it must necessarily be flowing toward the load and therefore,
must have been re-reflected (as Walter Maxwell has been saying
for decades). Having only two directions in a transmission line
makes it easy. If EM energy is not traveling in one direction,
it has to be traveling in the only other direction available.

So when does the article appear in Phys. Rev?

No news is probably not good news.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----