On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:15:58 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

There is zero net refraction, given by definition. So all your
refraction math was irrelevant and negated nothing.

The math remains inviolate, exhibits the laws of conservation, and
negate your premise. So far you have added nothing to offset this.

The reason that optical engineers know so much more about power
and energy in EM waves is because

Uh-huh. Against myself, a practicing and successful optical engineer
with optical patents; you, a xerox jockey, are comparing yourself?
:-)

Bubba, you can't even answer simple power questions like:
You have a one square cm target that is irradiated with
64 microWatts of 660nM radiation at a distance of 1M
from a light bulb. (which is less than the power reflected from
one of your example interfaces and still visibly quite bright.)

How much power is found in the 555nM spectrum expressed
in Lux?

Both are power spectrums within a 30nM BW.

How much total power is the light bulb radiating?

Optical engineers can answer this, and I will by midnight. ;-)

No one expects a binary engineer can (example of a simple 1 or 0).