an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

You have agreed that I am deffeent and that I have the right to be
defferent
therfore I all right or at least not wroug

You can be "deffeent" and wrong too.

You keep insisting that I am "agreeing" with you.

you seem tobut then it like Senator Kerry you flipflop very fast

Nope.

No. Rude for treating Hans the way you did for ANSWERING your
question.

stevie you are flaimng me for reareaching part 97 which you complained
I wasn't doing

No...I was complaining that you're lying.

prove it

See all under "an_old_friend"

Pretty hillarious stuff there.

i was rading the sections of part 97 and noticed this hole in the stuff
from the FCC

There's no hole. Other than in your head, that is......

and decided to coment on it

And made a fool out of yourself in the process.

you claim everything I do is some of plot to confuse you and now Hans

The only thing confusing about you is your broken grammar and
illogical expressive patterns.

get over your self

Get over WHAT about myself?

When was you last post on Radio here


Which was evident in your post.

lie


making up wityhput eveident that I am trying to decieve folks

"wityhput eveident"...?!?!

What the heck is that?

what you are engaged in attacks with nothing to back em up

You didn't answer the question.

WhatEVER that was, it wasn't English.

Try again.

You suggested intercourse. We are the same gender, and that's
deviant.

not according to medical authority

Sure it is. What "medical authority" are YOU refering to? Jack
Kevorkian?

nor did I suggest I would #### you

Good thing. Or you WOULD have something to worry about.

And I've never seen the word "truthfull" either.

lie

Nope.

and you cut stuff out again

I see no need to re-post things that are three or more posts old,
Mark.

I have used the word before therefore you have seen therefore you are
lieing about not having seen it

"Truthfull" is not correct, Mark.

That YOU spell "mistruthful" taht way does NOT make it right.

never seen it before

Maybe because Webster's isn't written in crayon...?!?!

doubt that

why are you so obsessed with crayons?

Because I am certain that writing with crayons is about your
developmental level.

You act childish, so I assume you function better at a child-like
level.

which does not alter its threatening nature esp from a guy saying "one
shot one Kill even in illiopolis"

More out-of-context quotes, Markie!

nope

Yep. Sure is. Just like Brain keeps trying to insinuate that I
allegedly threatened to "slash tires" and "terrorize wives".

you typed it

And Brain snipped it and quoted it out of context.

Forgot your "Is that your best shot" comment that inspired the
response?

nope

Obviously you did.

nope you just think you are above the law, fortunately for you it
doesn't seem to bother with usenet

So...it's OK for YOU to choose words that can be misconstrued to a
violent intent, but if anyone else uses such words, it's "above the
law"...

Uh huh....

What "shot" were YOU suggesting, Markie...?!?!

I was not suggesting a gunshot

That's not what I asked you.

I asked you what "shot" were YOU suggesting.

Do you not understand the question?

I have 100% Hukman DNA

ROTMFFLMMFAO...AGAIN ! ! ! !

so

So what is "Hukman DNA"...?!?!

Is that some distant alien race that seeded the Earth...?!?!?

There's no "distorted uses" I can apply to words that YOU won't
print clearly.

Stevie you didtort my words wether I type them clearly or not

How can I "didtort" your words any worse than YOU
do...?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?

An absolute lie, Markie. You were MONTHS with that
song-and-dance!

nope you just did not bother to read it so I had to repate it

You're lying, Morgan.

You lied about being in the Army.

You lied aboout being threatened.

You continue to lie about being "stalked".

Why not just TRY being truthful for ONE WEEK and see if you aren't
accepted just a wee bit better than what you are now.

and then these years later you claim I never did at all

which lie is your final answer?

There's no lie on my part, ergo no final answer.

You needed reapeated a year later and again 6 years later

Nope. YOU needed to be reminded that there is only ONE meaning of
the word "drafted" as applied to military service.

the choie of the word was alas unforunate, but I am not bound by your
narrowminded vision

It isn't MY "vision".

YOU chose to represent yourself as a commissioned officer in the
Armed Forces, ergo YOUR "choie" of words could only be construed as
being in the military vernacular.

More lies! Sheesh, Morgan, where DO you get this stuff...?!?!

you sent those email I remember them well

I am sure you "remember" a lot of things in your few lucid
moments.

None of it correct, but I am sure you THINK it is.

What time? What money? You're a useless layabout. What have YOU
got to do?

Stevie I run my own company. a small one, I take care of a Terminal ill
man, I am active in politics. I even try to get on the air

Oh God...that's scary....

Bad enough the poor fellow is ill, but to have to wake up and see
YOUR mug...

my income is the range of about 30K a year, and I own my home (not me
and the bank but me) I have a family

Congratulations.

Most sexual deviants live in the middle of "Middle America", and
everyone is aghast when the news hits the presses.

that you are bigoted enough to judge a person by his typing is not my
fault

It's not just your "typing", Mark.

It's your ignorance. It's your behaviour. It's your arrogance.

But most of all, it's the lying.

Note that Lennie Anderson is quite verbose...bordering poetic on
rare occassion, yet I despise him.

I despise him because he's a liar...And he doesn't take too great
care to hide his misrepresentations, either.

You don't humilate me.

No, I don't.

progress boyo

But not what you think wusso.

anoy harrass stalker threaten me yes

No. No. No. No.

yes yes yes

Three out of four.

"Progress boyo"

you dare to claim you don't anoy me?

Do I?

I hadn't noticed.

Jesus Mary and Joeseph

Peter, Paul and Mary.

yes all in that #### brains head of yours

that #### for brains of yours

Have you been taking Toiddie's correspondence course for online
cussing?

talking about killing people is always a threat and never justified on
usenet

Then why did you start it?

and anyne who make the threats you do over Ham radio must be unblanced,
not sure exactly how, but you must be

What threats have I made "...over Ham Radio..."

to kill me

I've NEVER discussed you over Ham Radio, Mark.

of course you are distring the context again I gues I shoudl have said
over the subject of Ham radio but that would hardly help since youd
just find some other way to twist my words

No twisting needed, Mark.

If you'd learn PROPER ENGLISH instead of exepcting the rest of the
world to adapt to you, you'd find life a lot more pleasant.

Speaking the same language as those around you does NOT detract
from your individuality or "freedom", Mark. It enhances it.

I don't discuss you on the air. I wouldn't be able to stop
laughing long enough to get my call and QTH across...

never said you did another of your distortions

No distortion.

YOU said that I threatened to harm you "..over Ham Radio"...

In the COMPLETE context of the sentence, any reasonable person
competent in English would ahve drawn the same conclusion

Please, Markie...

Tell us of YOUR credentials to determine mental instability...!

years of reading your posts

Then you are acknowledging that you ahve NO credentials.

i don't ahve anything nor does anyone else

yes a cheap shot at your spelling, but I pass on most of them

Don't use the letter transposition as an excuse to ignore the
question, Mark.

What are YOUR credentials for determining mental instability?

Do you have any? Yes or no will suffice.


If you understood English well, you'd have a better than average
likelyhood of spelling it correctly.

not realy proves you don't know much about dyslexia

I know it can be treated.

Yes according to Tom Cruise where did he get his MD?

Tom Cruise needs an MD in order to tell people he had a dysfunction
that he got help for?

Steve, K4YZ