On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 01:48:00 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

No, they are your details
All the math was per your explicit design. If that embarrasses you,
fine, I will accept that as "my" details.

and I choose not to waste my
time with your logical diversion of the basic issue.
No one is forcing you to explain what you cannot. What you choose to
respond to is strictly your choice and wholly your responsibility. If
you don't care to answer for why the reflections of your model are
TEN TIMES BRIGHTER THAN THE SUN, and call this power cancellation
instead, no one really expects you to anyway.

Why don't you give us another hymn instead about understanding and
such? Is your paper in the hands of a devotional publication? Do
they cater to a herd of sacred cows? Would this make you a holy
cowboy? :-)