Cecil Moore wrote:

Jim Kelley wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:

Since, in my example, glare has been completely
eliminated, you are asking: "What is the wavelength
of nothing?"


But in order to conserve energy, wouldn't the glare have to re-reflect
off of an interference pattern and continue - I mean - start moving in
the forward direction? ;-)


Wave cancellation causes the re-reflection but you are essentially
correct as described perfectly on the following web page.

I was just joking with you. That's not really what happens.

Note that
there are only two directions in an RF transmission line.

Lemme write that down. So just how fast does the RF energy move?

This applies to single frequency coherent glare (reflections). You see,
Jim, the field of optics has no virtual reflection coefficients for
you to hide behind.

Don't blame me for all this virtual stuff. It's a perfect fit for your
theory though.

73, ac6xg