On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:50:20 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

It has been quite obvious that this poor math was necessary to support
a faulty premise: complete cancellation. There is no such thing,

Of course, in reality there's no such thing as complete
cancellation.

There's no such thing even in a perfect world. Adding qualifications
like "in reality" changes nothing. The poor math treatment you
offered is not justified by appeals to conceptual arguments. Being
conceptual still allows (as I have demonstrated in the actual math)
them to be far from immaculate conception. We've seen you assume the
name of Occam, Galileo, Newton, but not Madonna. ;-)