On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 22:19:36 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Since there's no such thing as a perfect world

This is a conceit one would only expect in a teenage girl's diary.
Or perhaps at the juke joint crying into a beer. The remainder of the
exposition is a sorry example for justifying the cracked paving stones
to an absurd destination.

Why you choose to engage in such silly diversions away from simple truths is
interesting.

Simultaneously silly and interesting? Your topic and you are the
first one to take shelter in this veneer of pouts and sulking. I've
laid out the math, complete, you've both acknowledge it, and then
claim it was unknown to you.

It bears re-visiting to wrap this up, but I have no doubt it will make
any impression on your future claims. That is of little concern to me
however as every forum needs a joker in the deck. It keeps stasis
from dominating this as a morgue - and silly is as silly does.
"But at my back I always hear
Times winged chariot hurrying near;
And yonder all before us lie
Deserts of vast eternity."

You have taken a simple conceptual example to extremes.

Simple concepts have the capacity for resilience and extremes and can
tolerate all such examinations to emerge unscathed. A binary outcome
has no resilience and is remarkably brittle, suffering subtleties with
stress fractures such as you exhibit. Your work, outraged at
examination, simply doesn't measure up to any of these "ideals" you
hide behind.

Tomorrow we continue the brutal examination.