K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

where in the rules does it make that requirement?

You've GOT to be kidding...

not at all been asking that for months you never answer

Glad to prove you wrong again, Markie.

not at all

97.103 and 97.307, among others, require specification tolerances
be maintained.

BUZZ you still are not quoting any rule requiring such

The operator is respaoniblie if the sation does not comply but nothing
requiring any particular method of ensuring it

same ole **** steve

There are others.

then cite one of them finaly


NOT giving up pointing out how Lennie Anderson tries to misdirect
and deceive on issues pertaining to Amateur Radio...

then get your facts straight

I do.

then try telling the turth if you know it

"the "turth"...?!?!

yep the turth


It's you and Lennie who have some situation awareness issues to
fix.

not realy

Absolutely "realy"

not at all

you are the one that reads something, adds to it and then makes claims




Putz.

probeing another of lennies points for him

ctuuing stevie sexual stuff again

You're doing what? "ctuuing"...?!?!

sure


but just typed adjacent keys on the keyboard

Which adjacent keys? You haven't corrected whatever error you
made.

sure did

There's any number of idiotic mistakes you could have made.
Please show your work.

BYS i already have


Steve, K4YZ