K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Sun 24 Jul 2005 23:45
"...not surrendering your obligations to technology."
Geeee-susss! Think about what a dumbfork thing you wrote!
You sound like you've mounted a lecturn but forgot to
light your mental lantern. The light ain't come on yet.
The light IS on, Lennie.
I guess it was MY fault for assuming you'd take the whole context
of the message and reply in kind, but then that would ruin your rant.
One does NOT ensure that one's station is operating properly
simply by virture of the digital display of the device in question.
The FCC requires routine diagnostics of the station to ensure it's
compliance.
where in the rules does it make that requirement?
You've GOT to be kidding...
I'd like to see the schedule that Riley has Steve's station undergoing
such "routine" diagnostics. Must be some kind of license modification
or compliance agreement for out of band operation.
Staying WITHIN the band edges IS "proper operation."
The ONLY way you CAN stay within (and be LEGAL) is to
USE TECHNOLOGY!
Yep.
With diagnostic devices EXTERNAL to the device in
question...Signal generators, Spectrum Analyzers, etc etc etc.
still don't know what tools you need even after being told
Sure I do. And those do just fine.
Yup: "etc etc etc" finally got you to the right arena, if you have a
good imagination (and you do). Hi!
giving up trying to explain radio to dumbfork stebie
NOT giving up pointing out how Lennie Anderson tries to misdirect
and deceive on issues pertaining to Amateur Radio...
then get your facts straight
I do.
It's you and Lennie who have some situation awareness issues to
fix.
You appear to have issues with everything that Len may say.
Putz.
probeing another of lennies points for him
I'll never be probing ANYthing of Lennie's, Markie!
That's YOUR fetish!
You're the one who claims to wear the rubber glove.