an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

where in the rules does it make that requirement?

You've GOT to be kidding...

not at all been asking that for months you never answer

Glad to prove you wrong again, Markie.

not at all

97.103 and 97.307, among others, require specification tolerances
be maintained.

BUZZ you still are not quoting any rule requiring such

Sure it was.

Ask Phil Kane.

The operator is respaoniblie if the sation does not comply but nothing
requiring any particular method of ensuring it

No "particular method". But requires it all the same.

same ole #### steve

Nope. You asked. I provided. You responded with profanity.

THAT is the "S.O.S", Markie.

There are others.

then cite one of them finaly

So, you want ME to "carry your freight", eh...?!?!

Rest deleted. Beyond Markie's IQ.

Steve, K4YZ