Eric F. Richards wrote:
Spare me.

Ignorant? yes.

Propogandistic? yes.

Treasonous? not even close.

LEARN WHAT WORDS MEAN before you use them!

Also, learn about U.S. history. It is EXTREMELY hard to charge
someone with treason -- that vas VERY intentional by the founding
fathers.

Finally, try this: Disennt is not treason. Dissent is not treason.
Dissent is not treason. Tattoo it on the inside of your eyelids until
any moment not thinking -- which for you should be nearly all the time
-- is occupied by that phrase.

Agreed.

To the writer of that excrement:

Clearly you haven't heard of the firebombing of Tokyo, which was more
destructive to lives than both atomic detonations together.
And so what. Both the firebombing and the nuclear explosions were
designed to get the Japanese to stop fighting a losing battle. One
that would have cost our side and theirs huge numbers of killed had a
land invasion taken place.

You haven't heard of the bombing of Koln and Dresden.

I like to think of them as partial payback for London and numerous
concentration camps.


For that matter, you haven't heard of the Rape of Nanking, Serbia,
Rawanda and Somalia. You, sir and/or madam, need a ****ing clue.
Unless, of course, you LIKE your ignorance, and like waving it around
in public...

Y'all are a collection of stupid, ideological ****s. Get lives, or
stop wasting ours. Please.


The author of that piece sees the world in colored and white terms:
The white oppressors against the colored (usually black) oppressed.
I'm gonna guess he is also a proponent of slavery reparations for those
with some link to the formerly oppressed from those with some link to
the former oppressors.