What you suggest is justice is actually lynching. It would be interesting
to actually have such a trial BEFORE the execution. Such a trial would
provide a forum where the accused could raise all of the issues, including
the lawfulness of the war.

SeeingEyeDog wrote:

He wasn't advocating violence. He was advocating Justice!!!
Had you committed treason like Jane Fonda you would have spent
time in prison or have been shot by a firing squad. I advocate the
latter. __________________________________________________ _________

Lawyers Henry Mark Holzer and Erika Holzer seeks to make the case that in
fact, Jane Fonda engaged in acts that make her guilty of the actual legal
grounds for treason, which as laid out in the Constitution, defines the
act as "levying War against them, or, in adhering to their Enemies, giving
them Aid and Comfort."

Their conclusion was simply that there was "enough evidence to submit to a
jury, that the jury could have convicted her, and that a conviction
probably would have been upheld on appeal."

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...le.asp?ID=1468

"uncle arnie" wrote

Expressing a view and suggesting shooting another person are different
things. This has nothing to do with viewpoints and everything to do with
advocating violence.