View Single Post
  #38   Report Post  
Old July 30th 05, 07:20 PM
an old friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default


K4YZ wrote:
wrote:

Snarly Stebie doesn't do much else in this newsgroup but
boast generalities of a non-specific nature while generally
insulting everyone who doesn't agree with him.


Untrue, but then when has "truth" been your suit, Lennie?


entirely true

He has changed his boasting so many times that it is difficult
to know what he has actually done or experienced.


I haven't been boasting.


sure have been boasting about your achivements sayning they are better
than Lenn without of course saying what they are


On the otherhand this post I am replying to is over 300 lines
long.


So? Now you are trying to ditate how people may express themselves


Snarly Stebie's version of "truth" is whatever he wants to
claim on any particular day. He has NO references on any of
it. Some examples:

Stebie would challenge "call the VA and they can tell you"
[all about Stebie's military record]


Untrue.

You at one time doubted my having served at all. The VA CAN
varify that information. You refused, of course...Lot's of
excuses...Nothing new there...


No Stevie the people who do that but only to a small degree is USAREC
in St.Louis MO

But they can't verify a claim that you will make spefic enough to even
ask about


Big snip

In the beginning of Stebie's tirades he mentioned a Medical
Discharge that cut his marine career to 18 years (rather
than a full 20). He then made that an "Honorable" instead
of a medical discharge; if he had gotten that discharge some
5 years before (his alleged time was 1974 to 1992), why
would he not have said "honorable" in the beginning? That's
all archived, BTW.


Well...MOST of it is archived. You've taken some literary license
with what was said, but I am sure it's much more colorful in your mind
that way.


and you admit to this or not?


Stebie claimed to have been in "seven hostile actions"
during his military career, but it seems he is spinning
that into the USMC being involved in those...while he was
in it. He has no proof at all shown in here that HE was
IN any of those hostile actions. That's in newer archives.


And we won't discuss any of them.


then they are claims without proof, or BYS Stevie lies


Just like you harrangue Dave Heil over his service in the State
Department (all of it fact-based and verifyable), I shant give you the
pleasure. You can go ahead and insist "it didn't happen" based upon my
refusal to tell you the details, if you care to, but ti still doesn't
make it any less factual.


just appling YOUR OWN STANDARDS Stevie

Stebie has claimed "working in military radio communications"
but isn't at all familiar with the very common (quarter
million R/T units made and operational) SINCGARS...(SNIP)


Lennie, I guess it's silly to point out to you that SINCGARS is
NOT the end-all of radio communications in the Armed Forces.


but you know nothing of the system where I a 54E know a afair about
them, without having served a commo related MOS. make it very dubious


Your 3000th telling of yet another SINCGARS story does not make it
any more valuable than any other communications resource...Then, now or
in the future.

Nore snip

At best, Stebie's claims are only for an "Assistant" NCOIC
position at a MARS station in Okinawa in the 1980s. MARS
stations are NOT a regular part of any service branch radio
communications...are, at best, a sort of special services
like operation where they MIGHT be used for regular comms
in case of catastrophic happenings to the Defense
Communication System (DCS).


break
But...but...but...LENNIE!

YOU are the one who made the big deal about who runs MARS, etc etc
even when it wasn't an issue!


more stevie lies

That's in very recent archives.
Worse yet, it took months for Stebie to acknowledge that
the Department of Defense directs MARS, even when given the
link to the directive itself available on the Internet at
the DoD website.



you claimed otherwise

It was never in question.

Lennie is uttering a blatant falsehood every time he repeats this.

Lying IS Lennie's forte. This is why Lennie H doesn't get the
respect and admiration he THINKS he deserves...


Stevie just goes and on dening his own words

More Big Snip

a real whopper there Stevie


True! Google archives have the proof in them, in thousands of
personal-insult messages generated by Stebie...with only a few
(perhaps a dozen at most) which are actual discussions devoid
of personal attacks at somebody.


Nice try, Lennie.


BUZZ wrong it is the truth although with your limited mind you may be
unaware of the sheer volume of **** you generate here in RRAP


Looking in the mirror again, obviously.

A survey of the posts of "Lenof21", "Lenover21", etc etc will show
precious few that don't "diss" "Rev Jimmie", "Katapult Kellie", "Der
Feldwebel", etc etc etc.

PRECIOUS few...

And the darned ironic thing is that I'm the one who usually jabs
Lennie, yet Lennie engages in all these "persoanl insult" diatribes at
almost everyone...


you must be reading a different Usenet than I am Stevie or be lying or
delusional


The problem is you, Lennie, and just a few other ner-do-wells who
seem to think that what you do is "constructive".

yes we think it is constructive to look behind the curtain at the real
world


That would disturb Stebie's fantasy. He wants the nicely-ordered
military-style discipline he is no longer a part of...(SNIP)


Wrong.


right You can't handle to turth



(UNSNIP)...one where
everything is explained and laid-out, no room for deviation from
the precise order of things. He can fit into that. However, if
the environment changes, he gets very upset and angry. He can't
handle disagreements with his opinions, tries to defend himself
(no need in normal discussion not about a person) by issuing a
series of personal insults directed at his perceived "accuser."


Even MORE ironic that I have never addressed you (or anyone) as
the "accuser"...that would be a LennieTerm. One that helps to
establish "victim status"


more Steve evasion, and another lie you have called me on accusing you

There is, nor has there ever been, a SINGLE "correct" way of
doing things in amateur radio.


There's been ONE constant in Amatuer Radio...

The license.


then why don't and why have you never treated other license holder with
any respect?

even if I granted you abuse of Lenn on that issue it doesn't explian
your treatment of Myself of Todd and of Brain



The one you don't have...The one you CAN'T get.


More Libel Steve the second half of the statement is liekly not true
and you should know it is likely not true



Amateur radio is NOT a military...(SNIP)


Your reality is slipping again, Lennie...


no he is trying to guess at the nature of your twisted mind

You really stretch to make these up, don't you..?!?!


not at all you seem to act like a drill sgt (whatever the fool marines
call the army calls em that), and expect the rest of us are going to
fall in

sexual inuendo cut


But, the old rank-status-privilege class consciousness of the
old six-class license system suits the ordered, disciplined
military psyche.


You keep mentioning "military psyche" along with your 1950's-era
radio stories, Lennie...


yes he does. your point?


It doesn't take an LMHSW to figure you out...

More big snip.

Radio is radio.


No, it's not. Not in the APPLICATION.


Radio is NOT radio Stevie? my, my you do need your meds


This forum is about AMATEUR RADIO...Not Army, or PLMRS, or GMRS,
etc etc etc.


then why don't you write about Amateur Radio once and awhile


Big snip.

One MUST look at what other radio services are doing. Firstly,
amateurs must co-exist in the EM spectrum with all other radio
services.


We must co-exist in that we do not cause any disruption of service
to OTHER radio services. What goes on inside those band edges is a
whole different story.


IOW we should ignore the technolgies around us and focus on what? Morse
Coded OOK CW?


Secondly, other radio services, having (usually)
more flexibility in mode type use, can offer insight into
possible new methods of communications.


But...but...but...LENNIE!

YOU are the one who keeps yelling "IT'S JUST A HOBBY!"

Where does the FUN of operating radios that are software defined
and require almost NO human interaction to make work go...?!?!


I on't particular want to work that hard just to make the RADIO go, Id
rather spend my time and effort dealing with people at the other end


Thirdly, closing off
minds to what happens elsewhere and claiming it is "for the
good of amateur radio" is a simple cop-out, an excuse NOT to
learn, investigate, to enquire about new things, new
possibilities; it's a rationale for being LAZY.


Lennie...YOU keep repeating that threadbare and untruthful rant
over and over, and it's no more true today than when you first sprout
it.


you operate that way, Jim N2EY is politer about but operates that way



another stevie forgery

Steve, K4YZ