On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:16:54 -0400, wrote in
:


.......You need to check your facts before you start
posturing and posting. You end up looking like a fool when you're
corrected.


Where was I corrected?

I'll spell it out for you.................

You said the term "Line Flattener" was "more voodoo CB terminology"

All one has to do to disprove your claim is search for "Line
Flattener" The results show that all references to the term "Line
Flattener" are not CB related or voodoo.

You were just corrected.


Well, Ok, if you say so, tnom. It's not like CB mythology isn't full
of valid terminology used improperly like "common-mode currents",
"circular polarization", or using PEP to measure AM power. But if you
really want to harp on semantics I'll give you your day in the sun....
but wait! You said you "aren't very concerned with semantics"! Aw, too
bad, tnom -- you just proved yourself to be a hypocrite......again.








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----