View Single Post
  #38   Report Post  
Old August 2nd 05, 02:05 PM
I AmnotGeorgeBush
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (John=A0Smith)
IANGB:


You think you can argue philosophy with


intelligent people?


If the train of thought is too difficult for you to remain on topic, we
can discuss such limitations of yours you feel pertinent, but it's much
more productive to focus on that of which you already claimed instead
of running from it when corrected.

ROFLOL!!!!


John



This group has cleaned up rather nicely. The intellects among the group
rarely argue among each other. In fact, your posts have insulted
everyone who disagrees with you. What you misinterpret as arguing is but
mere corrections being bestowed upon thee's learning process



"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
... From:
(John Smith) iangb:

No need to consult the past,


Sure there is, otherwise such wouldn't be mandatory requirement courses
found in institutions of higher learning. Indeed, there is a huge need
in which to consult the past among intellectuals. It's when one wishes
to argue history that self-confusion is born.

it exists now, and


will be the future...


How profound! If our society does not learn from history, many times we
are condemned to repeat the same mistakes.

we all


reflect the present state of society,



Including those tribes in New Guinea that still utilize smoke signals,
eh? Nah,,,don't think so.


and so


does our methods of


communications...


True for the modern mainstream methods of communications, not archaic
hobbies like CB or CW.

... this is why amateur radio is now being drug


into the 2nd millennium, we have just gotten


around to it...


John


Amateur radio isn't being "drug" anywhere. On the contrary, it's barely
surviving as a method of modern communications, with the sole exception
of certain disasters which occasionally carry it to the news. The
dropping of code is writing on the wall. The hobby is gasping for air
and on its last legs.