From: "b.b." on Wed 3 Aug 2005 16:26
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
73 de Jim, N2EY
313
btw, you missed the biggest hoot in Len's comments - the part where he
says he offers an "objective" view...AS IF!
Like I said...too bad there's noit a penalty for perjury in those
comments...Page 1 would have got him in HAC right off the bat.
Now Steve libels Len... Who's next???
ANYONE who disagrees with stebie WILL get libeled...that's a given.
Poor stebie doesn't understand that reality isn't black-and-
white, governed by stebie's rules.
Stebie thinks anything written against HIS viewpoint is "libel."
Tsk, tsk, tsk.
tsk tsk