Thread
:
RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
View Single Post
#
4
August 5th 05, 12:01 AM
an old friend
Posts: n/a
wrote:
John Smith wrote:
N2EY:
Yes, your list there shows how quite insane FCC licensing has been,
however, the arrl has to bear a lot of this blame also, they used
political pressures for their personal gains.
The longest journey begins but with the first step, there are many
necessary steps now to bring amateur radio back in line with sanity...
John
So what is your solution?
Would you eliminate the technical parts of the tests because hams
aren't required to build or fix their rigs?
Would you eliminate all mode-specific and band-specific questions
because hams aren't required to use any specific band or mode?
Would you eliminate all technology-specific questions
because hams aren't required to use any specific technology?
*Besides* eliminating the code test, what would *you* change about
the license tests?
what I would do? gee id change the structure of the tests a pared down
basic test of rule regs, rf safety, bands stuff like, and several
(Passing only one of these) each test covering a type of operation in
detail, would even aloow a code test as an option for this second test,
so I kidnly like the Canda changes esp if theyd go a bit further down
that line
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:50:13 -0700, N2EY wrote:
wrote:
cut
Reply With Quote
