AOF:

Frankly, I have been much more interested in the lady hams equipment
myself... I think the FCC got that one right!

John

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 23:19:28 -0700, an_old_friend wrote:


John Smith wrote:
AOF:

Hey! You got proof the FCC is interested in an amateurs equipment? What,
is it a gay organization now?

John

not at all they are as interested in Feamle hams equipment as well as,
male hams, nothing gay there. a Bit nosey prehaps not gay


On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 20:40:09 -0700, an_old_friend wrote:


robert casey wrote:


Because you can never be certain that the ham will NOT
ever build anything. Additionally, all hams have technical
responsibility for their stations and the RF signals they
transmit.


If the FCC is to trust us with the legal ability to
pop the covers off our transmitters and make
adjustments and modifications, we need to have passed
tests to show that we have basic knowledge of RF and
such. That we'd know how to run and maintain a clean
operation.

It's quite rare that the FCC busts a ham for faulty
equipment anymore.

you know the last time the FCC busted a ham for faulty equipment