Mike Coslo wrote:

a bunch of snippage


I have to note that we speak of actual systems, real world devices -
some of which are yet to be made of course, but practicalities (granted
you much more than myself - but I am an RF neophyte, having come from
the digital world)

I have to restart this sentence to make it legible. Forgive me, things
have been interesting lately.

The systems you and I speak of are arguably buildable. There is solid
theory behind them.


Others seem to be more in the vein of "so there! or someone is going
to come along and prove you naysayers wrong!" mode.

Which is to say they are arguable only by people who just want to argue.

Faith based electronics.

I wonder how that tremendous antenna from the UofD is coming along?
You know, the one that is going to revolutionize radio? HF antennas a
few feet long that outperform anything we have today.
The one that was so "efficient" that it melted when the inventor
powered it with 100 watts. And I'm not the one who used the word
efficient, *they* did.


Oy oy oy

- Mike KB3EIA -