"Richard Clark"
What you have written is called bloated prose. It is suitable for ad
copy and trade show handouts that tout insignificant advantages only
because there is nothing substantial to present.

Eight pages of discussion from the report covering the conductivity of
earth has been rendered a foot note by your diminution of attention.
Your absurd conclusion that ground conductivity had no bearing on the
outcome is glaring contradiction to the scope and purpose of the
entire enterprise. To reduce this focus of efficiency to copper loss
is a toothpick in the forest of effort by these men.
__________________

You still provide no proof that what I wrote is incorrect
or inapplicable, I see.

I'm content to let objective readers decide for themselves
which of us has made the correct evaluation.

RF