View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old August 14th 05, 12:56 AM
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:44:03 GMT, james wrote
in :

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:25:57 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

+Hmmm..... why would a spectrum allocation advisor need a security
+clearance?

*******

Considering that the majority of the frequency spectrum from 200 to
400 Mhz is DOD primary control might be a reason.



Which is used mostly for air-ground operations. They also hold huge
chunks from 2.7 to 45 GHz. So?


Someone would need
more than casual knowledgable of some of the military communications
specs.



Why? It's not like they have developed a "stealth" radio.....


That in itself requires a minimal security clearance. Several
other reasons I can think of. Not uncommon if one has to deal with
military spectrum usage.



I -have- dealt with military radio, from HF to microwaves. I still
don't see why allocation requires a security clearance.







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----